Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 2/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 3/2003 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Diesel's and stuff 200

I thought the problem with the 3.5L diesel was that the connecting rods were too small. Cylinder wall wear sounds like another engine. Not to mention the early 80s gasser MBZ V8s with the single timing chains (that would toss chains and wreck engines). Or how about the head gasket issues on the newer V6s? Or the valve wear on the 6.xL V8s?

Let's not even mention the W123 climate control %)

MBZ isn't perfect, no company is. But they've made some pretty sweet diesels. If I were to own a diesel, there are two marques I'd consider: MBZ and Peugeot. The big difference is that parts for Peugeots available in the US (primarily 505s now) are much cheaper than MBZ. Plus the Peugeots don't hold their value as well.

Sure a 2.3L four banger isn't as smooth as the 3.0L five cylinder motor, but the four banger was available with a stick (something the MBZ turbodiesel lacks).

--
alex






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Diesel conversion [200]
posted by  someone claiming to be smkeddy  on Tue Apr 12 02:05 CST 2005 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.