The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Diesel's and stuff 200

I thought the problem with the 3.5L diesel was that the connecting rods were too small. Cylinder wall wear sounds like another engine. Not to mention the early 80s gasser MBZ V8s with the single timing chains (that would toss chains and wreck engines). Or how about the head gasket issues on the newer V6s? Or the valve wear on the 6.xL V8s?

Let's not even mention the W123 climate control %)

MBZ isn't perfect, no company is. But they've made some pretty sweet diesels. If I were to own a diesel, there are two marques I'd consider: MBZ and Peugeot. The big difference is that parts for Peugeots available in the US (primarily 505s now) are much cheaper than MBZ. Plus the Peugeots don't hold their value as well.

Sure a 2.3L four banger isn't as smooth as the 3.0L five cylinder motor, but the four banger was available with a stick (something the MBZ turbodiesel lacks).

--
alex






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.