Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 2/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 6/2004 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

240/850 200 1983

posted by  charm on  Sun Feb 16 14:13 CST 2003
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS] [RELATED]

If you like the diy aspects of the 240, why not expand your considerations to something at least similar. The 740's and 940's have the same engine/tranny combo and some report that they are even easier to work. I've never even been in a 940, but I can say I have driven several 760 turbos (still the 4 cylinder but loaded) and I like the way they drive. I have also driven 850's and I prefer the 740/60's, except for the 850R I drove, no station wagon should be able to do that!. I like the handling of all of the above but the seating position is hire on the RWD cars which I like coming from pickups and SUVs. The turning radius on the TWD is significantly tighter. Turning radius is not a big deal to some, but for those of us who miss there turns a fair bit, U-turns are daily occurence. Good luck!

Ken
--
Portland, OR 1987 240 dl wagon (not so rusty anymore) 'rustbucket'






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 240/850 [200][1983]
posted by  someone claiming to be GB  on Sat Feb 15 23:34 CST 2003 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.