Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 2/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 4/2002 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

240/850 200 1983

It really depends on what you want in a car. 850's are definitely quicker, more comfortable, probably safer, and better equipped. Having said that, they are also more expensive to maintain, more difficult to work on, and probably not as long-lived. And, they have the rare, but real problem of timing belt breakage which can cost you $3500 in about two seconds. 240's are slow, old tech cars, but they look good, are very predictable, and cheap to own, assuming you do some DIY and make use of the hundreds of Volvo grave yards around the country, as well as all the ".com" Volvo parts availability. And, 240's are cool. 240's are RWD. 240's are bullet-proof. 240's are the most functional car ever built. Volvo built its reputation on the 240 -- for good reason. I would take a late model, well-maintained 240, any day. Others may feel differently.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 240/850 [200][1983]
posted by  someone claiming to be GB  on Sat Feb 15 23:34 CST 2003 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.