The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

240/850 200 1983

It really depends on what you want in a car. 850's are definitely quicker, more comfortable, probably safer, and better equipped. Having said that, they are also more expensive to maintain, more difficult to work on, and probably not as long-lived. And, they have the rare, but real problem of timing belt breakage which can cost you $3500 in about two seconds. 240's are slow, old tech cars, but they look good, are very predictable, and cheap to own, assuming you do some DIY and make use of the hundreds of Volvo grave yards around the country, as well as all the ".com" Volvo parts availability. And, 240's are cool. 240's are RWD. 240's are bullet-proof. 240's are the most functional car ever built. Volvo built its reputation on the 240 -- for good reason. I would take a late model, well-maintained 240, any day. Others may feel differently.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.