Volvo RWD 700 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 5/2006 700 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

FCP vs. IPD vast pricing differences 700 1991

As said before overhead and R&D costs. They supply a lot of parts that they have to be selling close to cost. Cost? well add in the R&D and prototype stages, plus the materials and manufacturing. Do you think they are going to make much money on door pockets for the 700's. Not if they only sell 100 pairs.
But it they were to sell 2000 pairs that would be a nice piece of change.
Who else sells accessories for 240,700,900's other than Volvo of NA. NO ONE
If I was them I would bring in the BMW and Saab lines. That would increase their sales and lower the over head. I wouldn't touch any Rice performance parts only because there is so many suppliers across the country. Take a good look over at the Volvoworld web site, under production figures. Figure at the max only 1/2 of those cars are still on the road. Then figure that maybe 40% of the production was Turbos. So say 65,000 were built in year 19XX so what is left
13,000 turbos MAYBE. OR 260 per state. If you figure in Manuals which averaged
3% of production then your looking at 390 cars left in the US of that year with a turbo and a manual. In the last 3 years Honda probably sold more Vtec's that 700 and 900 left on the road.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New FCP vs. IPD vast pricing differences [700][1991]
posted by  D.P.  on Fri Jun 28 03:26 CST 2002 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.