Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 2/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 11/2000 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Re: B23F power vs. b230f 200 85

The others have hit on the main points - the B230F is low friction, designed for better mileage. Might lead to more quiet running, too (as long as you don't develop piston slap from the short piston skirts!) Computer controls also improved in that time (the B23 uses the earliest form of knock control, while the later models were a bit more sophisticated.)

The rear end ratio has a lot to do with how a car's acceleration feels. My wife's old '83 B23F w/autobox and 3.73 rear-end felt like it could launch harder than my '83 B23F w/M46 and 3.31 rear.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New B23F power vs. b230f [200][85]
posted by  someone claiming to be Rob Hanley  on Fri Nov 24 12:45 CST 2000 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.