Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 10/2002 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Failed 'Glove Test' after PCV system replaced 200 1987

Running a pipe cleaner through the manifold vacuum orifice, and then through the small hose to the flame trap housing would be step 1. Are you sure your guy didn't already do this?

Replacing that dip tube is a horror story, for sure. I can't imagine a kink, but also don't understand why it didn't fit the bore. Volvo's part suppliers aren't in business to keep 30-year-old cars like new, perhaps, or maybe the tech didn't want to risk a broken wire from a wire brush down the bore. Then there's that clamp you need to have the oil pan off to reach! Yikes.

In the end I think your idea to blow test it with separator removed is just what I would do.

Sadly, depending on the car's oil maintenance history, you might just be at the point where the rings are not containing the blowby they once did, and even when the PCV contraption is at maximum performance, the gases those rings pass are too much for it. I've read of many stop-gap solutions from increasing the manifold orifice bore to ditching the PCV for a catch can. Main thing you want to do is be certain where your car is on this scale.


--
Art Benstein near Baltimore

http://cleanflametrap.com/pcv_test.html






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Failed 'Glove Test' after PCV system replaced [200][1987]
posted by  Gaucho  on Wed Jan 15 02:58 CST 2020 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.