The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Re: B23F power vs. b230f 200 82

posted by  someone claiming to be iadr on  Sat Nov 25 10:00 CST 2000 [RELATED]

1/the 100530 cylinder head ports are superior to the 100398/100405.

2/there's (yup) less friction

3/there's dramatically lighter reciprocating weight

4/different (better) camshaft, in view of how most people drive and also more sophisticated control of emmissions.

5/volvo hp figures have been notoriously fictional since the 60's.

6/If you were canadian you'd not be saying that- in 81-early 83 we got the euro 136hp b23e- peaky but fast





USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.