The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

240 Torque Rods 200

I don't think it has anything to do with sedan or wagon, just angle. As to ride height, there sure is a lot of argument across the web about whether or not the GTs had different springs. My take on that is that all the springs were the same (excepting wagon rears). Tuning was done with the bars and shocks. I don't know about the Homologation Specials though, seems likely they'd have something special.

Ride height certainly does affect pinion angle. I wonder if these were offered as a means of coping with the "standard" loads different people carried in their vehicles. Looking at the drive shaft in the 77, it is almost perfectly straight from the trans right to the pinion. I'll bet the angle is almost zero. Makes one wonder what happens when you put 400 lbs of passengers and luggage in it. I'm tempted to put shorter rods in it when I do the bushings.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.