Volvo RWD Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 11/2004

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Go 940!!

posted by  RepairmanJackal on  Tue Apr 5 18:43 CST 2005
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Tue Jun 10 09:52 CST 2014
[RELATED]

I'm in the minority here, but the 1995 940 Wagon is a *very* nice ride. Still a B230F engine, nicer interior, smoother, quieter ride, more cargo capacity (yes, I've put a washer and a dry in the rear of my 940 with plenty of room to spare. Plus, the rear end doesn't rust out like a 240. If you want classic, get a 122.
When I traded my 740 GLE for my wife's 240, I was shocked at the rough ride. I vote 940! Just as easy to work on as a 240, easier, in fact. plus, even more boxy!!
--
Volvo #6: all wagons.... 1972 145S, 1976 245 DL, 1983 245 GL, 1986 740 GLE, 1990 740 GL, now a 1995 940...






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Dilemma...Keep my 89 240 Wagon or jump at a 95 940 Wagon?
posted by  Jamie A  on Sun Apr 3 14:06 CST 2005 >
  • New Go 940!!
    posted by  RepairmanJackal subscriber  on Tue Apr 5 18:43 CST 2005 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.