Volvo RWD Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 5/2003

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

200 Vs. 700

I would suggest you try to drive a few of each if possible to see which you prefer. The one factor to consider is the that 240s were more prone to rust in floors and lower rear qtrs--depending on your geographical location. 740s are more luxurious--if that term can be applied to volvo.I always thought the 240 was more comfortable then any 740 Iv owned-but--thats just my opinion. Both are excellent cars-- frive a few of each if possible and which car makes you smile the most.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 200 Vs. 700
posted by  someone claiming to be Lakeitel  on Sat May 24 11:21 CST 2003 >
  • New 200 Vs. 700
    posted by  natespaint  on Sat May 24 14:08 CST 2003 >
  • New 200 Vs. 700
    posted by  Bishop  on Sat May 24 16:08 CST 2003 >
  • New 200 Vs. 700
    posted by  wheels subscriber  on Sat May 24 16:08 CST 2003 >
    • New 200 Vs. 700
      posted by  someone claiming to be Lakeitel  on Sun May 25 16:20 CST 2003 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.