The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

ECU Issue 200 1989

A 1989 240 does not necessarily have a bad ECU (as far as I know). I have not had any problems with mine, though I suppose my parents could have replaced the ECU sometime in the 1990s before I became "aware" of the car. From reading on here, I gather that the switch to "good" ECUs was made sometime during the 1989 model year.

Supposedly the 1988 240 is the penultimate 240. The advantage the 1989 models have over 1988 is the addition of rear headrests (a comfort for rear passengers and a safety feature in the event of a rear-end collision). The disadvantage was the switch to "LH-Jetronic version 2.4," which removed adjustable timing. I personally prefer the '89 model year and think the headrests make it a better year than the '88, but it's not that huge of a difference.
--
'89 244 GL -- 111,X080 miles (see profile for info on car)






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.