Community Forums:

I find that there are plusses and minuses to each.

I like the accessory layout of the 700/900s along with the wider engine
bay. No alternator right below the turbo or wire from the starter running
across the front(!) of the engine. And no nasty rear trailing arm
bushings to deal with. Much easier blower motor too. Better rust
protection (which may be an issue in NY).

That said, the 240s aren't horrible cars, and at least for some stuff like
brakes have better components (four piston front calipers v single piston
sliding ones on the 700s) at cheaper prices. Some things are just simpler
on a 240, like the seat mounting stuff (which I think is kind of a pain on
the 700s). Simpler wiring in many cases, and no delicate heater control
valve to worry about. Oh, and don't underestimate how nice it is to have
the distributor in an easily accessable spot.

For long trips, I would prefer a 700/900 (IMO the seats are that much
nicer).. but I would also prefer a 240 over most other cars out there.

- alex

'85 244 Turbo
'84 245 Turbo