The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Re: 200-series vs. 700-series ALL 1984-1990

posted by  someone claiming to be Matt B on  Sun Nov 26 06:23 CST 2000 [RELATED]

There is a local Volvo mechanic here in town.

When the 700 series cars first came out, he told me that 700s were going to make him rich.

He is now a rich man.

Overall, they are solid cars (stay away from the v-6), but they seem to be plagued with lots of electrical problems....seats, windows, turn signals....the list goes on...and on....and on....

If you want solid Volvo reliability, you'd be best to stick with the basic 240.

-Matt B

even 240s are too new for me...





USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.