The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Re: further reading of FAQ would have yielded: 200 1989

posted by  someone claiming to be Joe Doniach on  Fri Nov 24 16:24 CST 2000 [RELATED]

Yes, thanks, John, I did find the info on testing the O2 sensor in the FAQ, after posting my message. I dutifully followed all the steps and determined that my old sensor was bad, so I replaced it. The problem seemed to be fixed, I cleared the error codes, and the car ran properly with no more "check engine" light.

I was congratulating myself on having saved all sorts of expensive parts and labor being thrown at it by an auto repair shop when I went to start the car this morning. Guess what? the problem is back again. So now I'll go back and do what I probably should have done in the first place, and clean all the connections per Guy W.'s suggestions.





USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.