The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Let's talk rear ends! :) 444-544

"A swap to a B18 rear axle assembly on a B16-powered PV would result in a LOWER top speed? I'm certainly not looking for that...."

According to period road tests, the 4.55 ratio 85 hp B16 544 was a mph or two faster than the 4.10 ratio 90 hp B18 in the same car. FWIW, according to the same road tests, under acceleration the two cars were dead nuts even all the way to 80 mph.

I have personal experience to back up that last fact. Back in the day (1966-ish), I had a '62 B18, my brother had a '61 B16. It took dozens of 1/4 mile drag races :) to finally come to the conclusion they were perfectly matched cars, so far as acceleration was concerned. I don't think we ever ran them against each other on the open road (top end), so I can't confirm the first road test fact.
--

Gary L - 142E ITB race car, 73 1800ES
YouTube Racing Videos






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.