The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

flame trap in late model 240...even worth having? need tutorial 200 1993

hi sages- not sure im following on the rationale here behind saying the flame trap can be eliminated due to crank case fires possibly being caused by carbs which cars dont have any more. crankcases need ventilation to reduce pressure built up by oil fumes and blow by gases from the combustion chambers. most american cars either had an open pipe to the atmosphere to vent these gases but that was replaced by pcv systems which had a valve to sense the buildup of pressure in a running engine and route them back to the throttle plate on the carb to be burned in the cylinders . about 63-64 the pcv systems came in and prevented venting to the atmosphere(a no no with increasing concerns for emissions). if you eliminated the frame trap in the volvo 240 which my 92 has you would still have to route the crankcase gases to the combustion chambers or the pressures would cause seals to leak oil correct? thanks tons oldduke






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.