The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Swapping rear end- Worth the trouble?? 900 1995

In the interest of getting the best MPG out of a 95-940na which the manual indicates has a rear gear ratio of 4:10, & lists the turbo as having a taller gear of 3:73 . Is it worth the time, trouble & $$$ to do the swap. With the 4:10 I'm right around 3K rpm's @ 70mph. Don't want to lug the engine though. With the 4:10 I find myself using the OD switch on certain road conditions to keep from lugging the engine.

On my old BMW I've already swapped the stock 3:46 diff. for a 3:25 limited slip. I think I get about 2 extra mpg cruising mileage. Hard to believe this long heavy 635 with a big 3.5L engine, gets better mileage than the 940. The bimmer is a 5sp. & it did change the gearing a little bit. Find myself using 4th more frequently on long climbs, but with a manual it's easy to stay in an rpm range that doesn't lug the engine. This engine doesn't come on cam until around 3K.

Anyone done this? Thanks Dave






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.