Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 7/2009 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

ZF vs Cam steering racks 200

posted by  RenoHuskerDu on  Sat Dec 23 08:57 CST 2023
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS] [RELATED]

We have one 1991 240 that has a ZF rack in it. I just replaced the fat fluid return line across the top where it had been worn thru by the oil pan due to sagging motor mounts.

All our other 240s seem to have Cam racks, with small diameter fluid lines. The Cam in our 1978 242GT has excessive play on the driver side, toe cannot be set. And it leaks a lot if left undriven for a few days. I've taken that brick out of service.

Some opine that the ZF is a superior rack. I'd hoped that the 1990 M47 parts car we just bought was a ZF rack...but it's another Cam.

What would you gentlemen recommend? Take the easy way out and put in another Cam? Or keep looking for a ZF rack?

Reno, Central TX, 6 bricks of which 4 run.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 1 ZF vs Cam steering racks [200]
posted by  RenoHuskerDu  on Sat Dec 23 08:57 CST 2023 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.