posted by
someone claiming to be smkeddy
on
Tue Apr 12 02:05 CST 2005 [ RELATED]
|
|
Has anyone ever converted their gas 240 to a diesel? Did you use an older 240 diesel engine or has anyone tried this with another diesel like Volkswagen for example?
|
|
-
|
|
|
Isn't the Volkswagen the SAME diesel?
Unless you plan to burn waste oil from restaurants, why would you want to
convert to a smelly, heavy, noisy engine that has an unfriendly power curve?
--
George Downs Bartlesville, Heart of the USA!
|
|
-
|
|
Hmmm,
Not "completely" true. I drive Mercedes Diesels and they are not noisy nor smelly and have very good power. My full sized diesel powered S class sedan is much more powerful on the highway than my 240. The difference between gasoline and Diesel engines are like the differences between piston and turbine based aircraft engines. While the piston engines develop power quicker than the turbine based engines the turbine based engines are much more powerful. The diesel engines get most of their power from torque. Granted the Volvo and VW engines are on a totally different quality level than Mercedes engines the common urban legends about smokey noisy diesels are generated from poorly maintained cars with severe engine problems. Even gas engines stink and make noise when they are at the end of their service life. A high torque engine can be fun too. I have had lots of fun passing high end sports cars on a steep grade without even downshifting while their engines are screaming through every gear change as I effortlessly glide by them.
Personally if I were going to put a diesel into a Volvo I would consider doing an OM-617 Mercedes Benz 5cyl turbodiesel in there. The problem your going to run into is emissions. Even though you have an emissions exempt engine in your car your VIN number will still register as a gas engine. Depending on your emissions laws there may be some sticky paperwork to go through to get your "Gas VIN" exempt from emissions.
Before you do your conversion go find a diesel powered car and drive it for a week or so. Some people (especially the lead foots) can't adjust to the different way the power band works in these cars. For high speed highway cruising they are ideal. My Full size car (with over 380K miles) gets 30mpg cruising comfortably at 80mph on the interestate. If your looking for longevity and fuel economy diesel is the way to go.
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Clayton
on
Tue Apr 12 09:14 CST 2005 [ RELATED]
|
|
Do you have any idea what you are talking about? Benz diesels not smelly? I have to pass those things (which is easy) just to keep from puking on the fumes. Benz diesels wear out their cylinder walls worse than the gas engines. Why would anyone have an S class with a diesel? Must be from europe. Most modern gas engines have emission levels so low that shops had to buy new equipment just to measure the CO and HC. Diesels have their place in trucks and boats, but not cars.
I figured it wouldn't be polite to tell the original poster he is crazy to swap in a diesel, but to recommend he should is nearly criminal.
|
|
-
|
|
Hmmm,
Since my everyday driver is a "smoke belching" Mercedes diesel I do think I know what I am talking about. Correctly maintained these cars do not smoke. My car has never smoked in the entire time I have owned it even when I accelerate heavily even with the 380K it has on it.
Actually the S class diesel was a US market only car made as a stop gap measure to get past the new fuel economy legislation in the 1980's. Considering the 126 chassis and 116 chassis diesels top out at about 110mph they would have never been great cars on the superhighways of europe. My paticular car is unusual as it was a factory delivery that slipped through the federalization process since it was a "US" model. The European lamps on my car and several euro only features were a custom request from the original owner who took delivery in Germany.
Diesel engines very much have a place in modern cars. They have at least double the life expectancy of a gasoline engine and get better fuel economy. On the open highway the torque allows you to pass easily without even downshifting out of your cruising gear. The new VW Jetta and Golf TDI's get 50+ mpg that easily rivals that of hybrid vehicles with 40+ year old technology. The new E class diesel develops more than 200hp.
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Clayton
on
Wed Apr 13 05:48 CST 2005 [ RELATED]
|
|
Well I have worked on them - 240's, 300's turbo and not turbo. They smoke. They smell. They toss timing chains. They leak oil. Whatever you save in fuel you will spend on other things on a Benz, so the idea that a Benz diesel is a cost saving is crazy.
The "Volvo" diesel, being a VW Audi piece of crap I will admit is worse. They are all pre-chamber engines and they smoke and smell.
A Benz diesel is like having a Lear Jet with a Jet ski engine. Why bother.
A Peterbilt is great with a diesel. So is a Hatteras. Not a car.
|
|
-
|
|
Im glad your not my mechanic. I have owned several of these cars and have not yet had this experience. Perhaps you might want to invest in a training course.
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Clayton
on
Thu Apr 14 07:19 CST 2005 [ RELATED]
|
|
YOu've owned several huh? That's a trend that predicts the experiences of the many.
As long as we are getting personal, you must have meant "you're" instead of "your".
When Mercedes says "engineering like no other car in the world" they mean it. Just check the warranty and recall problems they have been having for years.
|
|
-
|
|
Yes,
I have owned several of these cars in addition to having several friends and co workers who own them as well. To be blunt and to the point its obvious to me that you have had little experience with these cars and quite frankly are in the dark about some important knowledge in order to service them correctly. If your ever in the Atlanta area I would be glad to show you two correctly tuned OM-617 series engines in my 300SD and 300D that both have in excess of 300K on them each that don't smoke. In fact I would even be willing to drink coffee with you as you thumbed through my Bergsama Motorworks Diesel Performance Tuning and Repair manual so you could perhaps have a better understanding of how to work on them.
You are right about some of the later model diesel engines however as there have been several recalls and repairs made. If memory serves me one of those recalls was for the trap oxidizer on the OM-603 series engine which is a much later design than anything that appeared in the 123 chassis car. I don't have much confidance in any of the later model Diesel engines after the OM-617 but then again Volvos made after the 740 make me really nervous as well. :)
Thanks for catching my gramatical mistake. Perhaps you should trade your wrenches for a red pen and serve the world in a different way. Out of politeness to the other people reading this exchange I don't plan to respond to any further comments. Your more than welcome to e-mail me directly with any more information that will convince me that the two fine automobiles in my garrage are smoke belching junkpiles.
|
|
-
|
|
|
Beostar, I second you on that. Unless the engine has been woefully neglected, or over a half million miles, a trained diesel mechanic with the proper tools and some aptitude can make an MB diesel run without smoke and stench. It's the hacks who can get a gas engine to run adequately "by ear" (because of its relative simplicity) but fail to comprehend the importance of timing an injection pump properly (and troubleshooting glow plugs properly before messing with it!) who are responsible for the sooty, gutless diesels belching smoke. If you can't make it run right, keep your hands off it & send it to someone who is competent.
--
Chris, Dartmouth NS Canada 70 M-B 280SE, 83 245DL, 84 244 turbo, 90 780 turbo, 92 VW Golf
|
|
-
|
|
Yes,
I think a lot of the common misinformation about diesels is spread by people stuck behind city busses and other vehicles that do belch out huge clouds of smoke. Additionally some of the "badly designed" diesels such as what General Motors offered in the early 1980's are to blame for this as well.
I do most of my own service work but "critical" things such as injection pump timing and valve adjustments go to my highly skilled MB mechanic. The same holds true on my Volvo. Jobs that are really messy or that require skills that I do not possess are left for the professionals. I am sure that many people here have learned the hard way that its important to go to a specialist for their "weird" car so that they get someone who know's what is going on. Volvo's and Mercedes are engineered "differently" than the common domestic and Asian car that so many McMechanics are used to. Specific knowledge is critical as are high quality original parts. Fortunatly there are so many Volvo and Mercedes lovers out there that both of those critical elements are abundant.
Btw Im jealous. Not only do you have a 280SE but you also have a 780 Bertone Coupe. :)
|
|
-
|
|
|
Well, the 280 has some issues that I'm working on - some really dirty collision repair work that I only discovered upon removal of the fenders (replacing the subframe mounts somehow ended up with the entire suspension & drivetrain spread across a barn floor for the past year... this summer will see a lot of sandblasting, hammering, and leadwork (no plastic bodyfill, thanks!) And there's some bad transmission flare when cold, but I'll leave well enough alone for now, I don't know any good M-B transmission guys or gals. But for a big, heavy 35-year-old car, what a blast on a winding back road at 90mph! As for the 780, it's almost on the road - just waiting on an ECU. Can't wait!
--
Chris, Dartmouth NS Canada 70 M-B 280SE, 83 245DL, 84 244 turbo, 90 780 turbo, 92 VW Golf
|
|
-
|
|
Heh heh,
Good luck on both of them. I am sure you will get all the issues ironed out soon. Im on the prowl for a 280SL 107 chassis car because of the 2.8L engine. Unfortunatly SL prices seem a bit insane to me. Ill probably pick up a "basket case" car with an original engine and spend some money bring it back from the grave rather than pay more than $10k for a questionably serviced car with owner customizations.
|
|
-
|
|
|
well they do say you have to be smart to work on diesels.
re timing chains - the volvo diesel's critical design flaw in my view is its timing belt - an "interference" engine with a rubber timing belt - belt failure or tensioner pulley failure equals disaster.
|
|
-
|
|
Yes.
Unfortunatly a lot of Jap cars have this same issue. Following your maint schedule usually keeps you out of trouble.
|
|
-
|
|
|
Not that you need any reassurance in the car you drive, but I'd love to have a car with a diesel engine like yours. Your Benz is beautiful, but even if it were a diesel Volvo, just with a better engine, I'd happily drive it over a gasoline-powered car.
I'd save money with it, due to the comparable prices in fuel and the better gas mileage with a diesel, and most diesel engines today have a decent amount of power, at least against the B230F. The *new* diesel cars are quite awesome--I'd love to have a (turbo) diesel VW Jetta/Golf or one of the Benzes. Some of the older diesels are smelly and nasty, but I realize that they're not at all representative of diesel cars in general. I wish this technology were more prevalent here in the States.
--
'89 244 GL -- 111,005 miles (see profile for info on car)
|
|
-
|
|
They are common an inexpensive. If your interested in buying get one with the OM-617 5cyl Turbodiesel. The 123 chassis and the 126 chassis both came with this engine. The 123 chassis is probably the "worlds cheapest car" because it is built with the simplicity of a Volvo 240. Contrary to the previous "Mercedes Mechanics" advice these cars are extremely cheap to operate. Parts are abundant an inexpensive and even if abused they still want to run forever. Correctly maintained they are very cheap and provide a lifetime of dependable service. From 1981-1985 they came with ugly headlights on the US versions. My car has European headlamps and is a 1982 model with 380K miles. Timing chains are a normal maint item and should be replaced at 200K and just like any other mechanical component will eventually fail if you run it outside of its normal operating lifetime (its cost about $300 to replace the last time on mine including labor). AVOID at all costs the 3.5L diesels as they do have a design flaw that makes them prematurely self destruct if your not religious about your maint program. A fully maintained 126 chassis S class car is like no other (to steal the new MB advertizing campaign) on the open highway. Plenty of road feel but a comfortable controlled ride that is not too mushy but not bumpy at all.
I am very much learning a lot about my new 240 wagon. Personally as much as I like Mercedes Benz cars the Germans sort of loose the concept of the wagon. The 240 and its solid rear axle gives lots more space than in the German cars. While the 300TD's and 300TE wagons handle better their full independant rear suspensions and hydropnumatic load leveler systems intrude into the usable cargo space. With 6'2" feet of space I can get almost 6 full sized swedish grandfather clocks into the back of it (stacked and on their sides of course). Ironically its nice to have a Swedish antique in the garrage as I deal in Swedish and Scandinavian Antiques. I have yet to "bottom out" the suspension in my 240 even with the cargo section loaded full with cases of heavy leather bound Swedish books. :)
|
|
-
|
|
Errr... cheap W123s? Not around here. First off, they've got the rediculously unreliable and expensive climate control (the 240 does not), then there's the wagon's self-leveling suspension, and all the vacuum controlled goodies.
And then there's the resale value. Most ads I see for the W123 bodied cars are 3-4k even for the examples that need significant work. You can find a 240 in comparable shape for much less.
Sure, I love the W123s. A friend of mine had a turbodiesel sedan. Great car to drive around. Cheap it was not.
--
alex
|
|
-
|
|
Hmmm,
I have heard about the climate control issues but never experienced any major issues. As for resale it depends on the area your in. Here in Atlanta Ga you can pick up 123's pretty cheap. Even at 3-4K a car that can easily go a million miles and has an abundance of cheap replacement parts to go even farther if you have the patience is a cheap car.
There are two schools of thought when it comes to automobile ownership. There is the expensive route and the cheap route. The expensive route involves buying a car as cheaply as possible and then trading it in constantly to avoid doing any major service work to the vehicle in a false effort to save money. The Financing costs, Insurance costs and resale value costs easily outweigh any major repair costs. The Cheap way involves buying a high quality car and spending a good amount on one that is the one you want and keeping it as long as you can. Over 20 years or so even a $2,000 repair is cheaper than going through 5 or 6 cars to keep from writing a big check.
The reason I bought my 240 is its a cheap and high quality dependable car that I plan on keeping a long time. Same thing for my 123 and 126. In comparison to the "new car shuffle" it is a very cheap way to own a vehicle. My S70 was one of the most expensive cars I ever owned. At about $600 a pop for every service visit and constant problems covered under warranty and then the insurance costs and finance costs and about $20K of resale value loss. On both Benz's I spend less than $600 per year in service costs each and have yet to be stranded from either one (something I could not say about my S70). Hopefully the new 240 is nothing like the S70.
I do agree there are "some" expensive aspects of the MB product line there is stupid cheap and smart cheap. Smart cheap involves spending more money to get a high quality vehicle that will last and stupid cheap involves trying to spend the least money possible and getting screwed in the process and having to buy multiple vehicles and loosing money in the process. As well Even at the 3-4K figures you claim Volvo 240's are not far behind Mercedes in resale. When I was looking at my Wagon I was told to start at $3k and start deducting for quality issues.
Considering the reliability and longevity of both the Volvo 240 and the MB 123 cars and their relatively low entry prices I cant think of cheaper cars to own. On top of being cheap to operate they are both quite safe and comfortable vehicles.
|
|
-
|
|
|
Clayton,
I gather you're speaking not from driving a Mercedes diesel, but from seeing soot-covered, smoke-belching, worn-out VWs, and the rumors of an attempted class-action lawsuit against Mercedes for ONE particularly terrible engine they produced in the mid-eighties that routinely died around 80k miles due to cylinder wear & block warpage. (Granted that's fine by GM's standards...) ONE badly engineered motor in the last half century (or better). Give them some credit! In general they're wonderful motors, reliable as any red block Volvo, clean-burning, efficient and pleasant to drive, albeit a completely different feel than a gas engine (flooring the accelerator? No! - use some finesse & roll into the throttle instead). I must respectfully disagree with you here.
On the matter of practicality, however, I'd say don't bother with it unless you have a Mercedes to dismantle and plenty of time to make it fit (and if you've got a good diesel Mercedes, why not just drive it?). The Volvo diesel is a VW, same motor as the old Golf/Jetta 1.6 diesel, but with 2 extra (and poorly cooled/lubricated) cylinders tacked on either end. It's not a truly bad motor, nice for long haul highway driving but it really pales in comparison to Mercedes for longevity and it's very maintenance-intensive. And good luck finding a decent diesel mechanic to work on it!
--
Chris, Dartmouth NS Canada 70 M-B 280SE, 83 245DL, 84 244 turbo, 90 780 turbo, 92 VW Golf
|
|
-
|
|
Yes,
That engine is commonly found in the 350SDL from about 1990 on. The 3.5L MB diesel in both the 126 and 140 chassis S class sedans is something to go out of your way to avoid. Everyone makes mistakes but one would have expected more from the engineers in Stuttgart.
|
|
-
|
|
I thought the problem with the 3.5L diesel was that the connecting rods were too small. Cylinder wall wear sounds like another engine. Not to mention the early 80s gasser MBZ V8s with the single timing chains (that would toss chains and wreck engines). Or how about the head gasket issues on the newer V6s? Or the valve wear on the 6.xL V8s?
Let's not even mention the W123 climate control %)
MBZ isn't perfect, no company is. But they've made some pretty sweet diesels. If I were to own a diesel, there are two marques I'd consider: MBZ and Peugeot. The big difference is that parts for Peugeots available in the US (primarily 505s now) are much cheaper than MBZ. Plus the Peugeots don't hold their value as well.
Sure a 2.3L four banger isn't as smooth as the 3.0L five cylinder motor, but the four banger was available with a stick (something the MBZ turbodiesel lacks).
--
alex
|
|
-
|
|
Hmmm,
Actually 123's including diesels come with manual transmissions. The problem you run into is they are not really common. Also the 190D comes with a manual.
Personally as much as I like french car design I can't say I would be interested in owning one. I have an abundance of places to buy parts for my MB's and Volvos as well as several service choices. I have been burned in the past by both parts vendors and service places. Having only one or two places to buy parts and get service would put someone at a severe disadvantage when it came to getting the best possible deals and service.
Speaking of cheap cars I wish there were Citron parts and mechanics common here in the US. I could easily see a 2cv in my driveway scaring the neighbors.
|
|
-
|
|
|
I agree that a diesel swap isn't very practical. The volvo diesel has its fans, but overall it doesn't seem to have a good reputation.
Over the past year I've taken two long trips in western europe using rental cars with diesel motors. And I drive an 83 mb240d here as well as some volvos.
Drawing on these experiences, I would agree with beostar's comments above. I would say he knows exactly what he's talking about.
|
|
|
|
|