|
With all the threads about V-8 and V-6 and Ricer motors I was looking at my pictures and found this one. Early fitting of the M41 into V2. Not alot of room. As for power...I just don't get it. Not power, I have plenty of that but why anybody would NOT choose a volvo B-20 for improvement over a B-18 or B16. Without much $$ you can get to 135-150 hp. Which is a substantial increase from stock AND you still have the Volvo reliability. Most here have heard of my mods but a simple head shave of .060, Bored over .030, Isky VV61 "torquer" cam, Lightened Flywheel, Nice SU's, Header, Pertronix, M41, 3.91 rear, Discs all around. Pretty simple stuff and you have enough grunt to impress yourself and your friends. If a nitrous honda slides up next to you at the light, .... wait 40 years .... you'll still be motoring along and the Honda will be recycled into a space ship of some kind. Modification is great but keep it a Volvo! Maybe the new V-8 volvo?
Christopher
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Barongrey
on
Thu Feb 10 05:43 CST 2005 [ RELATED]
|
Loads of horsepower aond torque are fun, and I've considered making some changes to my car, although I aleady have the B20 (and an automatic). Frankly, I like the way the car drives and handles too much to REALLY want to change things.
Perhaps if the engine should die, I'd take the Buick aluminum V8 from my Dad's old P1800s. But then, it would verly likely exceed 200 MPH and the car just isn't built to handle at those speeds. Between the boxy body and the marginal brakes, I'd be sure to be over my head a lot!
Would anyone be interested in seeing pics of the engine conversion he did back in the late 1970's? I need to go see him in a few days, so it wouldn't be a problem.
|
|
-
|
I'd like to see some pics, just for curiosity's sake. I guess that is the engine Buick sold to British Leyland, who ended up putting it in *everything*? Actually, I think the Land Rover Disco was still using it (punched out to 4.2-ish liters) until just a couple of years ago.
I think you'd need HUGE hp numbers to get a PV up to 200. It is aerodynamically styled, which is often (and in the PV's case) largely the opposite of aerodynamically engineered.
--
I'm JohnMc, and I approved this message.
|
|
-
|
I'd like to see it too.
That was indeed the eventual "Rover" engine.
--
Mike!
|
|
-
|
You have to admit that a 170HP large displacement V8 (very low state of tune) will still be qualitatively different than a 170HP B20 (pretty well modified). Just an entirely different torque curve. And I thiink many of the folks doing this want a car that isn't just quick, but downright seriously scary fast. More of a weekend toy than transportation.
The appeal of the 'ricer' motors is twofold, as I see it.
1) Cost - some of these motors have been produced in massive numbers in more recent decades, and they are easy and cheap to obtain from a junkyard in nice, low mileage condition. Like the ubiquitous Mustang 5.0 drivetrains - lots of Mustangs die quick deaths and leave behind 25K mile drivetrains that can be bought complete for less than a decent rebuild of a B20.
2) Some of the engines represent build levels that just simply can't be obtained with a B20 - at least not without spending astronomical amounts of money on custom built race parts on something that would more resemble a Nasa prototype than a motor you could drive for 100K miles. An example would be the Honda S2000 engine and drivetrain, available for about $5k (engine, 6 speed RWD trans, ecu). That gets you a 2 liter normally aspirated motor that revs to 8900 rpm and has 240 hp, probably well over what even the most highly tuned B20 motors running on race fuel ever get - and the Honda engine can do that for 100K+ miles. I think you'd spend well over $5k getting 240 HP out of a B20 (even pressurized), excluding a quickie boosted to heck B20 that will only last a few weeks. And a 6 speed manual too - all without weighing the nose down. SR20DET's are similar - a factory boosted engine made in large volumes, cheaply obtainable, easily tweaked into silly HP numbers.
Of course, that all being said, I'm still certainly not jumping onto the engine swap bandwagon. I've just spent a fair amount of coin rebuilding my PV's B20. The PV is a light car - much lighter than the 1800 and 122, and far lighter than the 140 and 240. Unless you are drag racing people (at a strip, come on people!) for money a warmed up B20 makes for a very quick PV.
--
I'm JohnMc, and I approved this message.
|
|
-
|
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=7957870845&category=33615&sspagename=WDVW
Hmmm, don't know eactly how hard fitting the rear suspension would be, but being subfamed it might not be that hard.
But for the engine and drivetrain - how much would you spend to get an 8900 rpm redline, 240 N/A HP from 2 liters, and a 6 speed manual in a B20? All using parts readily available at dealerships everywhere, and having a huge aftermarket performance parts supply, so 240HP is just the startng point, not the pinnacle.
--
I'm JohnMc, and I approved this message.
|
|
-
|
I concur. I think a lot of the appeal(V6 or V8) has to do with either wanting to replicate youthful association with more powerful american cars, or on the other end wanting to adapt more efficient/cleaner(?)state-of-the-art internal combustion technology. I think the B18/B20 is a wonderfully resilient, easily maintained, and modifieable engine, and with a an M41, quite economical. I'm just looking for something that's reliable, fun to drive, and easy to work on myself. This powertrain in either a PV or 122 is all I need.
A short story:
I live in NYC. I'm now 55. One night couple of years ago, I'm driving down a street in lower Manhattan in my red (matte finish if you know what I mean) 67 122. I pull up to a stop light to the right of a new SUV with 4 or 5 kids inside. I can feel the SUV's bass, but their windows are rolled up.
A kid in the passenger seat looks over and sees me and rolls down his window and jokingly asks, "Hey, man, is that your FIRST car?"
The light turned green and as I put it in first, I turned to the kid and said, "No, it's my second car" and drove off. Like you said, I'll still be driving this long after that SUV has become something else
Since 1976 when I put back together a 444 with B18 and Dtype OD, it's been that and this 122.
|
|
-
|
I'm with you. Between my wagon and my 164 I've surprised a LOT of folks
in newer cars!
--
George Downs Bartlesville, Heart of the USA!
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Barongrey
on
Thu Feb 10 05:38 CST 2005 [ RELATED]
|
...besides, what people REALLY need to do is to learn to drive these cars properly. Even a bone stock 544 can be terrifyingly fast through mountain turns and whoop-de-dos!
It's not really a matter of torque or horsepower; it's learning to use what you have to its fullest value.
STORY: 1970...mountains of southern California (Hwy 133, I think), and I was driving my first car, a Peugeot 403 sedan. 4 cylinder HEMI with 4-on-the-tree.
I came up behind two guys in Porche 912's and blew past them like they were standing still. I stopped for gas at Maricopa, and they both pulled in behind me. They wanted to know what kind of car it was and to see under the hood. I told them it was an old worn-out French taxi (not true - I had just recently installed new cylinders and pistons, as well as some shaving of the deck and better valves) and showed them the tiny engine.
They just left, shaking their heads. I hadn't realized they were RACING each other! Perhaps if they had taken a few driving lessons...
|
|
-
|
Not fair to pick on the poor old 912 Porsches! Those just plain aren't fast with a Beetle engine in the rear. Or quick. Nor do they handle very well.
They sure look the part, but 912's were a sad little attempt at an entry level car. The 914 was a much more successful attempt in that while it was ugly, it was at least cheap *and* had decent performance.
--
I'm JohnMc, and I approved this message.
|
|
-
|
Now, now. The engine was only superficially a VW power plant. Later iterations had DOHC, etc...
You really did blow-away Porsches... Just not Porsche class drivers!
Kinda reminds me of a competition "street" driver's school I went to. Instructors sat in the car and gave you tips as you went around the circuit. Third instructor only said "If you had a real car you'd be damn quick"
I nearly let him bounce.
--
Mike!
|
|
-
|
Later 912's had DOHC? I thought they only made them for a few years, a cheap 4 cylinder version of the 911.
--
I'm JohnMc, and I approved this message.
|
|
-
|
That is SO right! (Except that it's Hwy 33, not 133 -- and what a fun road that is...)
|
|
|
|
|