Volvo RWD 700 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 4/2003 700 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Thinking of New (to me) Volvo 700 1992

I have owned an 89 740 wagon with 210k miles on it, Ive put 30k in a year on it, and have enjoyed it very much.

I'm thinking of getting another one for the wife, would you experianced volvo people recommend a 92 year 740 (I'm not a turbo fan) or should I go into the newer years and the dreaded front wheel drive. I have done most of my own work, engine mounts, timing belt seals ect, so I'm not afraid of a bit of work.

I understand the 89-92 740, would a 95 model year car be alot different?

Thanks for your opionions.

Eric








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

    At some point the 740 wagon became the 940 which was made until '95. I looked at a 91 or 92 940 but eventually found a '93 940 wagon. It is a really great car!. Volvo improved the rear seat fold-down over the earlier 740/940. In the earlier models where the head rests had to be removed to the lower the seat back. On the '93 the headrests automtically retract as the seat back fold down. 'Works really slick.

    The engine also was improved with oil jets to cool the pistons. This allowed closer piston fit which reduces the chances for piston slap which my '88 240 has. The AC system is set up with R134 and really cools. The cooling fan is electric.

    I'd strongly recommend a '93 - '95 940 wagon. The last and best of the Volvo red-block engines which you know how to maintain, rear wheel drive, great cargo room, comfortable. My '93 came with leather seats, heated electric rear view mirrors, heated seats, sunroof, decent stereo, is quiet, has locking torque converter, dash lighting wuch lets you see the instruments at night.

    My only gripes are it could use a little more power (VX cam?) and the alloy wheels collect brake dust which seems to bond permanently to the wheel paint.

    You could consider the 960 wagon but there you'll have to learn a new set of maintenance problems.



    Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

    If it's been well maintained, there's no reason not to consider it. As you already know from your 89, it's a great car for the DIY'er. There may be little differences in the dash / climate control area, but other than that, it's pretty much the same car.

    I couldn't tell from your post if it IS or ISN'T a turbo. If it's a non-turbo it will probably have the Bendix-Regina fuel system vs Bosch on the 89, but that's no biggy - you trade an AMM and one of the fuel pumps for a little more expense on some of the other components. I have the Regina on our 90 740 and I have found it to be a rather robust system (original O2 sensor and Idle Control Motor at about 140,000 miles. The longivity of the RPM sensor, RS relay, and fuel pump relay will be just like the Bosch (and so will the price).



    Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

      Thanks, I'm looking for no turbo, as the car is so old, I think simpler and the nontubo will potentially have a longer mialage life due to less stress.

      Thanks for the info.

      Eric



      Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.




<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.