The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Non-Turbo 2.5 vs. 3.2 liter engine: which is better? V70-XC70

posted by  someone claiming to be David on  Sat Apr 27 10:29 CST 2024 [RELATED]

I have had both. The non-turbo 5-cylinder is my choice. I kept it the longest (30 years) and had no major issues. Just kept going and sounds so cool.

Had a no-turbo 6-cyliner for 3 years, thinking I would sell the 5-cylinder but couldn't part with it. Again, the six was nice, but seemed boring. Didn't have it long enough to comment on issues, but it was trouble free during my ownership.

Cheers!






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.