Volvo AWD S70 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 2/2006 S70 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Synthetic ATF vs Conventional Dexron? III S70 1998

Hi,

I am about to flush and fill the Auto Trans.

From the posts here, it seems that Synthetic ATF is better in terms of shifting and down-shifting.

Is this true?

cn








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Re: Synthetic ATF vs Conventional Dexron? III S70 1998

    Second what Sin said.

    Synthetic ATF will run cooler, resist oxidation better for longer, reduce internal wear, and maybe even give a bit better mileage.

    I haven't run an automatic on anything but synthetic since AMSOIL introduced it some 17 years ago.









  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Re: Synthetic ATF vs Conventional Dexron? III S70 1998

    What do you mean by "Synthetic ATF is better in terms of shifting and down-shifting"?

    Synthetic ATF's are engineered to take more stress then the dexron III. They better resist oxidation increasing the drain interval, better resist thermal degradation protecting your tranny when you need it most, better low temperature protection (everyone always worries about their engine in the winter, what about the tranny?), have better anti-wear characteristics.

    If all you want is some smoother shifting, you will notice that using any plain old Dexron III to flush and fill. And you will arguably get smoother shifts flushing with a synthetic ATF. But there is no argument that a synthetic ATF will better protect your tranny, increasing its longevity.








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

      Re: Synthetic ATF vs Conventional Dexron? III S70 1998

      > (everyone always

      > worries about their engine in the winter, what about the tranny?)

      I'm not aware of any piston rings sliding up and down across any cylinder

      bores in my AT. Nor any chemical pollution from combustion byproducts.

      You're trying to compare apples to fish here... You make it sound as if

      the whole world is completely nuts for having not switched completely to

      all synthetic fluids. (The world is completely nuts, but not on account of

      that!)

      Engine oil has its functions; the primary being lubrication. Another is

      to withstand the elevated temperatures surrounding combustion. ATF's

      primary function is to be a hydraulic fluid (apply pressure here, feel it

      there). Not lubrication: if ATF is too slippery, the transmission will

      fail. Temperatures are also lower for ATF than for engine oil (esp in

      turbos). Apples to fish...



      You're correct in what you say about ATF being better, but Dexron is

      already better than what's needed, and synthetic is thus better than

      better.

      And I don't know that better than better is really any better (except in

      theory). The AT will likely out-last the rest of the car with or without

      synth ATF.

      - Dave; '95 854T, 111K mi









<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.