Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 10/2021 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

EGR vs. Flame Trap; High NOX at emission test 200

So my wifes 82 244GL failed the emissions test here in Oregon for the 2nd time in 3 days. The reports have shown high NOX both times. After reading the past posts and the worthless handbook the DEQ gives out, I have determined my problem to be one of two options. Either I have a bad Cat or the "EGR Valve" is gone. Now my question is, is the EGR Valve on an 82 the same as we call the flame trap? I am pretty confused in this area...although I do have a new Flame Trap unit ready to be installed (just never got around to it). I would like to try the cheap stuff out first before I invest some serious money in a Cat to pass this test. Anyone have some great thoughts?

If you are interested, my test numbers are as follows:
1st test:
THC- .54 (standard 2.00)-pass
NOX- 5.79 (standard 3.70)-fail
CO- 4.6 (standard 64.0)-pass
CO2- 667.7 (standard N/A)-pass

2nd test:
THC- .76 (standard 2.00)-pass
NOX- 5.02 (standard 3.70)-fail
CO- 5.8 (standard 64.0)-pass
CO2- 598.9 (standard N/A)-pass

Thanks to everyone
Ryan Rice
--
VOLVO LOVER WITH AN 80 AND AN 82






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New EGR vs. Flame Trap; High NOX at emission test [200]
posted by  rice  on Sat Nov 1 07:12 CST 2003 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.