|
I know that there are a lot of postings revolving(!) around this issue, but
maybe I can get a fresh perspective. My '68 122 wagon (4speed w/ factory overdrive) wallows around like a hog on ice, or a sailor on liberty, or, or choose your own simile. I have Michelin 185-65-15s on all sides, factory size sway bar in front, none in the rear, and it's really scary at highway speeds. I'm afraid that a panic lane change will put me where I don't want to be!
So far I've done the following; new rear springs, all new bushings (both large and small), new KYB gas shocks(white), urethane bushings on the Panhard rod, and while things marginally improve, (just like when you wash and wax your car it drives better!!)it still handles like I have 10 bags of cement in the back.
Could the Michelins have an especially soft sidewall which makes the car sway
overmuch? Maybe I didn't pay real close attention to the wheels I used, but they all have that shallow groove where the rim meets the wheel center, so I think they are the wider ones. I'm thinking of mounting 195-70-15's on the rear (the rear tires need replacing anyway)
This car is my "pick-up truck", daily driver, so visuals are really secondary. But, the 185-65-15 Michelins look a little too small in the rear wheel wells.
What part number should I be looking for in my pile of extra rims? I have a thick after-market front sway bar I removed and replaced w/ the stock one, I don't have a rear sway bar, could this help? I'm sort of out of options, and don't want to keep throwing money at a problem I don't understand.
Thanx all
|
|
-
|
First off, thanks for the rapid responses. This is a good community to be a part of. I've been sitting in Volvos since my dad bought a NEW '72 145E two weeks before I got my drivers license,(do the math)! I've owned every Volvo carbed, but the elusive P1900, and have 8 older Volvos (mostly split window PVs). I even have a Sugga (brag, brag). But, as I mentioned, this 220 is my everyday beater, bought it from a boneyard for $300, dropped in an extra engine, and started driving. So, I'll admit to a certain (irrational)disinclination to put a bunch of time and money into it. It's a paradox, I know. I'll put tons of time and money into cars I hardly drive, and practically ignore the one I drive all the time. The shoemaker's children go barefoot!
To answer some of the questions and suggestions;
- I'm in San Diego, so not much ice, but a lot of 65mph+ freeway driving. "Hog on ice" was a phrase for the feeling of "squirmyness" which really describes the handling. Remember the Tom Waits song? Since it is a sort of pick up, I do usually have some junk in the back, maybe 30-50lbs., (old bumpers, a dead starter, or two; plus the spare tire, full tank of gas, etc, etc.)
- I just looked and the tires I have on the car are actually 195x65x15, NOT 185x65x15, Michelin MXV4 Plus Energy (whatever that all means). My suspicion of the tires was because when I stood next to the rear tire, and pushed against the side, the whole car sort of oozes sideways, just as if the tires were really underinflated, and the sidewalls were paper thin. But, I usually have had them at around 35+lbs. To confess, I probably have driven them beyond their "junk by" date.
- The car is sort of rough looking, but it is complete (all the chrome, etc.). I like having the original wheels for the looks, the original hubcaps, and trim rings. I know that in Europe widened slotted wheels are readily available, but not here. I'll spring to get mine widened, but I'd like to know that it will really help the problem.
- The KYBs aren't my first choice either, but Bilsteins aren't in the budget,
the ones I have are reserved for the '69 1800, and new ones, well, I do like to eat, and take the girlfriend out once in a while! I know, priorities. Hey, how about the idea of helper springs, or maybe air shocks?
- The car came (from the boneyard) with this big 'ol sway bar on the front, and nothing on the rear. I just assumed that with a big one on the front and nothing on the rear, it was somehow overstiffened, or unbalanced, or somesuch.
So, that's why I replaced the big one w/ an original size. Maybe I was wrong.
- I have also rebuilt the front end last summer; new upper and lower 'A" arm bushings, idler arm, tie rods and the steering box were overhauled. Ok, I didn't go out and get it aligned, but I promise I will. I guess that I thought the 122 wagons to be such tanks that a lot of fine tuning wasn't necessary. Maybe I was wrong.
- Since this is a later 220, the Panhard rod is different than the standard, or older one. This translates as a bigger "eye" where it attaches to the underbody. That is where I installed a red Urethane bushing. Man, I thought that the new rear springs were going to solve a lot of this!
- So, back to the big issue; I'll admit to being cheap, what honest (older)Volvo owner isn't? But, I also understand that you get what you pay for. I'll spend the money, but I want to solve a problem, not just throw money at a situation. Anything else I overlooked?
- so, onward through the fog,...
-
|
|
-
|
Thanks again for the comments and suggestion.
Things I'm going to do as a result;
- 2x new tires- I like Michelins, so a pair of 195x70x15 for the rear,
filled to, say 35lbs. Or should I go for 195x75x15?
- Have the front end aligned at a really good shop I know, been in business
long enough (50+ yrs) to know older cars. Take my shop manual with me.
- Take everything extra (junk, spare tire, etc.)out of the car after doing
the above so as to establish a "base level" of handling, Then start
adding stuff back in as needed.
- As a last resort, I guess I'll reinstall the bigger front sway bar.
- If all else fails, then I'll look into having a set of wheels widened.
Actually, I believe that this is a misnomer. The procedure involves
welding new, wider rims onto the original centers. I was quoted around
$75.00/per wheel. Does this sound about right?
- Does anyone have any experience w/ rear air shocks? I had a set in an older
('77) 240 wagon years ago, and they worked well enough.
- Suggestions, comments, criticisms?
Volvaholic since 1972; currently own '56 TP-21, 2x '57 PVs, '58PV, '58
Duett, '64 PV, '68 220, '69 1800S, '87 240 (for longer trips w/ less
adventurous passengers)
|
|
-
|
2x new tires- filled to, say 35lbs
I currently have over 40 lbs in the front and 35 on the rear tires (2-doors sedan). Especially the front tire pressure greatly affects the handling. Play around with the pressure a bit, so you find the right (?!) balance between oversteer and understeer.
Or should I go for 195x75x15?
No, stick with 195x70, it's already a higher tire then the stock one. (might want to go 195x65 if available). Going even higher will only increase tire instability.
Have the front end aligned
Definitely. Might want to read over this article
Take everything extra (junk, spare tire, etc.)out of the car
Not the first priority I'd say. Imo, a spare tire and the such should be part of the car.
I guess I'll reinstall the bigger front sway bar
Definitely. Period.
I'll look into having a set of wheels widened.
Widening by putting a new rim onto the center is the way to go. Not by welding in a 'spacer' that affects offset.
Also, again check the whole suspension for wear, play, funky rubbers etc. And check them shocks. I cannot recommend a certain shock to you, but just be very sure that the ones you use are in good shape.
btw. the amazon just ain't no race car:

Cheers, Ben
--
P131, '65, B20B+M47. P131, '69, B20E+AW71L+LSD. (www.tinustechniek.tk)
|
|
-
|
I had MXV4s on my VW Bus and I was most happy with them (two sets worth)!
Widened Wheels !'m cheap too! 15x6 4wd Bronco II wheels should be real inexpensive and are a perfect fit. Seach the photo gallery for "sven". thats my 64 wagon. Betcha mine is scruffier than yours!!
I have read that too stiff a spring or sway bar in the rear will accentuate the twitchness.. Take that with a grain of salt.
With the exception of the front end alignment, looks to me like you have done the enchilada i nthe fron and the back.
Interesting enough, they do seem to respond to some judicious tuning.
I was very uncomfortable with the wagginess the first few weeks I owned my wagon ,but with the addition of new parts and suspension tuning I am much more comfortable.
I think the sidewall flex you point out is a possible area for improvement. I am interested in trying out 205/55x16 wheels/tires to address that. Obviously a pretty pricey thing to do (that's why I have not done it yet). I am looking for some late model Crown Victoria wheels to work with.
|
|
-
|
First thing I'd do is put the big front bar back on. Don't worry about adding a rear one -- it'll be just fine like that.
Second thing I would do is get the front end aligned, if you can find a shop that can actually do this right. Try neutral camber (0 degrees), about 2 degrees positive caster, and just a touch of toe-in. If it feels like you have to keep correcting to make it go straight, add more toe-in.
|
|
-
|
Yeah, after doing those two steps, I'd definitely look into getting your wheels widened(unless you already have 5.5" wheels). I can't remember the name of the place, but I think there is a place down there in Cali that some local Oregonians sent their wheels to be widened. And if you're running 195 tires on 4 or 4.5" wheels, YIKES! You definitely need to get wider wheels on there if you want to be running a 195 tire. Do you know if you have the 4.25 or 4.5" bolt pattern? What year is it?
The Michelins could be part of the problem, but I think even more of it could be related to how much tire you have on skinny wheels. The michelins you describe are decent tires(I would never buy them), but definitely not stiff sidewalled.
--
Kyle - '68 142? - Oregon Volvo Tuners?
|
|
-
|
I would suggest a couple of things:
1. Urethane busings in the front suspension.
2. Make sure all other bushings are good.
3. Put at least 195/65 15s on it. They are less than .4" shorter overall. About 1 mph difference at 70mph. The lower aspect ratio is not going to hurt you a bit! Since you have overdrive 205/60s are just a tad shorter but still tend to be a good fit. Most important is to check tire clearance in the front at full lock. every where else seems to have good clearance. From my perspective a 15x6' with 1" offset is pretty hard to go wrong with.
4. Find a set of late 80's/early 90s Bronco II wheels in 15x6". They are a perfect fit with 195/65 tires. 205/60s are fine too and no problems with clearance anywhere. They look good, are cheap. and a set of 140 trim rings dress them right up. On a wider tire, i think that extra 1/2 inch makes a difference.
4. Definitely, make sure you have no toe out!
5. I have a standard IPD bar in the front (28 mm I believe) I prefer it over the stock one.
6. I can't say I am a big fan of KYBs. In fact i just don't like em much at all. (no offense intended) I have Bilsteins on my wagon and they were a MAJOR improvement in handling.
220s do seem a little "waggly" in the rear, but they are pretty stable all the way up to the point where they break away. They tires will REALLY squall before they let loose. But mine will swap ends pretty quickly once they finally lose traction. In general though, although they feel a little "loose", it is pretty amazing how hard (or stupid) you have to drive em, to get in trouble.
I've been driving my 220 for about 9 months and have put about 20K on it. I added a set of John Parker's lowered springs (progressive front, straight rate rears) to top it all off and my wagon handles simply awesome. To get the most out of it, use a smooth sure hand really pays off. A note of caution, mine doesn't like being jerked around I can bring out bigtime oversteer by being hamhanded. I have scared myself!!
I think once everything is in shape and dialed in you will feel much more secure.
Oh yeah, find somehere to really wring it out. Do a little autocrossing. A nice controlled environment to explore the cars limits. It's a great confidence builder.
Hope this is some fodder to consider. I 'm certainly not the expert, but I put a lot of very satisfied miles on mine.
Mike
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Erik
on
Mon Apr 4 02:56 CST 2005 [ RELATED]
|
I have two wagons and drive them year round...lots of snow and ice in the winter. The IPD sway bar, all uretahne bushings help, but the girls still like to wiggle thier butts, and it is very easy to rotate on ice (and sand!). The overload coils also made a positive improvement, less leaning in back. I think a rear sway would really make a difference, but have not found one made specifically for the 220. Hancook makes a pretty stiff sidewall that I have liked for summer driving, and michelin makes one too although it is more $$. You mentioned that it was your work truck, having a full load in the back changes the handling dramatically of these cars. On mine the cornering attributes are more accurate than the fuel guage :).
When you replaced the bushings did you have all four wheels aligned? having the rear off by just a little will make an impact (more wagging).
Otherwise, I recommend you take it out on the ice and practice when no other cars are around to avoid over correcting (spinning) and try down shifting on the ice when turning, you can steer the rear with the gas pedal if you don't have an LSD. :)
Good luck and enjoy.
-Erik
|
|
-
|
Most guys seem to like squatty tires. I don't because they reduce ground
clearance and effective rear end ratio and I don't feel like the car handles
better. I'm using 195-75/15 tires on mine on stock wheels. They are readily
available (although size varies with brand - you need smaller ones in this size)
and look pretty normal for as big as they are, especially with the thin white
sidewall.
Did you get rubber or harder upper A-frame and panard rod bushings? I like
the hard ones (urethane, delrin, etc available from several suppliers).
Is your steering box good and tight?
Make sure your alignment is right, just a smidge of toe-in and about zero
caster and camber. A little toe-out will really make it steer all over.
I would think that the heavier sway bar would be better too.
BTW I have been driving 122s since 1970 and 220s since 1984. I have two of
them now, both 1966. To the best of my knowledge there are not a bunch of
different stock wheels for the 122 unless you have the later 4¼" bolt circle.
(Most are 4½".)
--
George Downs Bartlesville, Heart of the USA!
|
|
-
|
122 unless you have the later 4¼" bolt circle.
(Most are 4½".)
Good point... I seem to have forgotten about that in my last post.
And off topic, but how do you get it to say 1/2 and 1/4 like that?
--
Kyle - '68 142? - Oregon Volvo Tuners?
|
|
-
|
"And off topic, but how do you get it to say 1/2 and 1/4 like that?"
alt-129 = ü
alt-130 = é
alt-144 = É
alt-160 = á
alt-161 = í
alt-162 = ó
alt-163 = ú
alt-164 = ñ
alt-165 = Ñ
alt-168 = ¿
alt-171 = ½
alt-172 = ¼
alt-173 = ¡
alt-174 = «
alt-175 = »
alt-248 = °(degrees)
etc, etc (consult your expanded ASCII table!)
--
George Downs Bartlesville, Heart of the USA!
|
|
-
-
|
I think those codes might work on a mac as well... or just google search "extended ascii table macintosh" or something along those lines...
I love my ♂
--
-Matt '70 145s, '65 1800s, '66 122s wagon, others inc. '53 XK120 FHC
|
|
-
|
Yeah, I saw you love your whatever that is, lol. I found out last night that by pushing the option key it does the little codes too... But which does which is unknown to me pretty much. ≥ ≤ ÷ … æ µ ˜© ƒ ∂ ∑ œ « ‘ “ ≠ – º ª • ¶ § ∞ ¢ £ ™ ¶§∞¢¢££¡™£¢` yeah, you get the point. I think that's the same stuff...?
--
Kyle - '68 142? - Oregon Volvo Tuners?
|
|
-
|
We used to have some Goodyear Wranglers on my beater BroncoII - got them as new take-offs from a Jeep for a price that was hard to refuse. They transformed the Bronco into a scary nervous mess at highway speeds. Just too much sidewall flex - tall squishy tires combined with the bronco's short wheelbase and you'd get into a sort of feedback loop with it if you tried to correct the gentle swaying too much. I think it was more of a sensation of an impending loss of control than a reality, but it was hard to untrain yourself to counter steer when you felt the tail waggling around a little. Never could cure it, finally got rid of the dreaded cheap Wranglers and put on a nice set of Michelin SUV tires and it tracks straight as an arrow now.
Similarly, I once temporarily ruined the handling on the Miata i used to have when I replaced the *excellent* original set of Bridgestones with a set of Pirelli's. Instanly, the same thing - a squirmy unsettled feel at highway speeds, that couldn't be 'tuned' away by altering the tire pressure.
Which brings up the final point - tuning the feel with tire pressure. Altering the pressure will make some subtle (and sometimes not so subtle) changes in the way the sidewalls deflect. (This is in addition to the why it changes how the tread sits on the pavement for better or worse). Generally speaking, more air pressure results in a stiffer tire. This has more to do with the transient feel as the tire goes from straight ahead to cornering, and not quite as much when in a steady state pull, but often the small things that happen in transition affect what the car does a little later - a little tail wag in transition can result in a full on slide once the car has started to rotate that way. So (within reason) you can tweak the handling from under to oversteer and back again by varying the pressures front to rear. The Miata was very sensitive to this - moving from predictable understeer to exciting voersteer within a range of only about 5 psi differential from front to rear. My suggestion to you would be to try a good 4 to 6 psi more in the rears than in the fronts (like 30/36) and see how that feels. If still a little to squirmy, try moving all the pressures up slightly (32/38) - until you hit the max pressure. Of course, at some point you might slightly reduce the traction by overinflating the tire relative to the load it is carrying - but generally I think you notice the feel of the tire a lot more than you notice the absolute grip.
--
I'm JohnMc, and I approved this message.
|
|
-
|
Few things... Why did you remove the thicker front swaybar? 195-70s are going to be a lot taller, are you looking for taller and/or wider? I'd go for 195-65s, they're what I currently have on my 142. I've never been a fan of Michelins, too spendy for what you get. Which model tires do you have? Wider wheels help with the feel a little bit if you have skinny ones. What are the part nubmers? I think George knows some of the part numbers. I can check mine on the 142, they're 5.5" wide. The thicker swaybar will help with the uneasy feelings on the highway, and keep the car more stable in all situations.
You say it feels as if there's a lot of weight in the back, what makes you feel like this is the problem? I think it's normal for the PVs to be a little tail happy, but I don't actually own one nor have I driven one so I don't know from experience. The thicker front bar would help with this in most all cases. Why did you remove it?
--
Kyle - '68 142? - Oregon Volvo Tuners?
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Charles
on
Sun Apr 3 22:55 CST 2005 [ RELATED]
|
I have found Michelins to be excellent tires. They wear extremely well (logged 100k miles on my last set and there was still a fair and even amount of tread remaining on all four), they stick to the road like glue and they are quiet, which is definitely a consideration if you find yourself on the highway for several hours out of the week.
You are really giving this guy a hard time about his suspension setup, Kyle, and while I don't want to be rude - do you really have enough experience with these cars to second guess the way that his suspension is configured? If I recall, you have been driving "vintage Volvos" for less than a year now (6 mos?). I have owned them on and off for the better part of fifteen years, and still don't know squat about the suspensions. Just some food for thought... :-)
|
|
-
|
I didn't mean to offend anyone if I came off that way... I'm just saying that Michelins are good tires, but you can get stuff that is just as good and sometimes better for almost half the price... Well, in regards to sticking to the road that is, many tires can do just as good of a job and many do better, but they definitely don't last 100k. I've never heard of tires lasting that long!
I live and breathe cars. I have wasted more time of my 20.5 years of life on them than ANYTHING else that I have EVER done. I know a LOT about them, and about how their suspension works, how changes in suspension work, and how to drive them. I have been driving vintage volvos for over 2.5 years now. As long as I've been on the brickboard. I've learned a lot through playing around with my 142, and now also I have a lot more to learn(electrical wise) on my 145 that I just got a couple of weeks ago.
And I'm not trying to be rude, just pointing out that I have a GREAT knowledge of cars. When I post, it's because I haven't experienced it yet, or I'm just trying to get people to think, or expand knowledge, or just to fill everyone in on my progress and fun and not fun adventures.
So I hope we're good here? =D Happy travels!
--
Kyle - '68 142? - Oregon Volvo Tuners?
|
|
-
|
Please disregard my mention of PV in the first post, I was thinking we were talking about a PV... I was just over in that forum last night and had opened up the post before and got them mixed up.
--
Kyle - '68 142? - Oregon Volvo Tuners?
|
|
-
|
Oh, and PV's are not tail-happy either!
--
I'm JohnMc, and I approved this message.
|
|
-
-
|
They have the exact same wheelbase as the 120 and 140 - 102.something inches (with a possible 1/2 inch stretch mid model for the 140?). The 1800 is the only shorter one at 96.something, and it isn't tail happy either.
The PV's 2250 lbs is very nicely balanced F/R.
--
I'm JohnMc, and I approved this message.
|
|
|
|
|