Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 5/2003 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Was rust a factory option? 200 1985

I just took a look underneath the wagan and bashed some of the rust off to try and get a gander at the frame. I bashed enough off to see that there is in fact a real metal frame attached to the car, and it seems to be in acceptable enough condition. My question is with regards to the underbody shielding panels which hide wires and hoses and all those goodies - I'd like to take the panels off and just buy new ones because they're a lost cause. At least I think it's a lost cause if you can push one finger through them without too much work. PS, don't tell me to write the project off as a certain failure in terms of ability to get stickered, I'm doing it as a senior project and the goal is just to learn some new skills, not get a reasonable car out of it.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    Was rust a factory option? 200 1985

    This just happened to me this weekend as well. I looked under the car, and the floor pan for the rear driver side passenger floor panel is about to fall off. I'm planning on taking the area apart. I'll clean/ treat the rust then bolt/weld a new pice of metal in place. As for underneath the car I was thinking of bolting some LEXAN on.

    I put some pics @ http://restoresb.blogspot.com/








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    Was rust a factory option? 200 1985

    the reason those cars 83,84,85,86,87 240s rust out the floorpans is from inside out.either windshield leaks,roof rack,am/fm ant.i live in south and have looked atplenty of so called creampuff 240s only to look under and laugh.unless you are half a structural engineer,the best way to fix floorpans is to cut or treat the metal the best you can[watch out around center support bearing]weld metal back into place and fiberglass over top of that,then unmdercoat from below.i realize that this is kind of vague so if you want i can email you with more precise ways of doing it,i have fixed several 240s.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    Was rust a factory option? 200 1985

    I have a south Florida car that is now in California so it has never been through a salty season. The only rust is below the back windows and that was recently delt with with POR-15. I'd be very careful buying a north east car.
    --
    Simon 80 240 300k 17 years. 'White Lightning'








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    Was rust a factory option? 200 1985

    I think '85 may have been the worst year ever for rust. I had a 244 which literally fell apart around the mechanicals when I lived on Long Island. It's hearsay, but I was told by my mechanic at the time (an exclusive Volvo and Saab guy) that for the 85's Volvo went to environmentally 'friendly' water-soluble undercoating, which actually absorbed and retained moisture. Given the Swede's proclivity for environmentalism, combined with the fact that the 240 glove box door is held on with candle wax (true, right guys?), I find this entirely plausible. I believe from '86 on the unibodies are galvanized and Volvo's ore one of the LEAST rust-prone vehicles on the road.

    I've had 7 bricks from a '63 122 to a '93 240 Classic, and the only one with significant rust problems was that '85. Floors finally DID give out - a great runner though. Probably didnt' help that I lived in a salt water environment and the road crews heavily dosed the streets at the first sign of freezing rain.

    Too late for you (or anyone with an '85 in cold climates) to prevent damage, just do your best.

    Good Luck!








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      Was rust a factory option? 200 1985

      I have a 1987 245 and rusty oh rusty. I replaced the tailgate with one from a '91 after the negative space overtook the positive space. Had some major body work done around the windshield and can fir my fist easily into the rocker panels. But that's Minnesota winters.

      The guy I bought it from said that during the '87 production run is when they started using all galvanized body parts. No real corroburation to the story, but I believed him.
      --
      Steve in Minneapolis - 1987 245DL 260k (driver), 1986 245DL 162k (resource)








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      Was rust a factory option? 200 1985

      My 86 has a severe case of rust rash under the driver's seat area despit having been Ziebarted and heavily undercoated by original owner.

      My 87 has rocker panel rash .....

      Must be our Maryland salted roads ....








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    Was rust a factory option? 200 1985

    Rust was a major problem with my 85 245,,which bit the dust
    at 356k miles. Never used a drop of oil, but I did have to
    remove the seats and put in some sheet metal. Absolutely the
    best car I've ever had. In fact, if I'd had half-a-bay of space,
    I'd still have most of it.
    Best of luck and Happy Brickin'!








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

      Was rust a factory option? 200 1985

      A friend of mine who had a severely rusted '83 Accord asked his mechanic when he should get rid of it. His answer? When the seat started to shift down. That seems to be waiting a bit long if you ask me ;)
      --
      Norm Cook Vancouver BC; 1989 745T 204,000KM







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.