I have a Tech Edge wideband sensor on my PV.
I wimped out and bought a prebuilt unit instead of soldering up the circuit boards myself. IIRC the controller was about $250. I then had to buy an L1H1 sensor, which is a bit pricey at around $120. Last, and least, was getting a bung welded on my header for about $20.
http://www.techedge.com.au - it looks like they are now selling a newer controller model that can use cheaper wide band sensors. The L1H1 sensor was only used for a short period on certain Cali-emissions Hondas - and when demand ramped up for use on wideband O2 guages the supply stretched drum tight. However, since then a few other cars have begun using wide band sensors too, so the prices are coming down.
As for results - what can I say? After about 20 seconds the sensor warms up and I get constant real time mixture information. I put mine on in conjunction with my DCOE's - I didn't trust my ear enough to get them into a good enough tune. Using it I was able to tweak the mixtures to a fine degree with some small fuel bowl level adjustments.
Also, while I may have been happy pouring gas down the DCOE's otherwise - the O2 meter has shown me how erratic they really are in use - going rich around left hand corners, lean around right. Spiking rich going over bumps. Etc. That's why I'm going to switch to a programmable FI system this year (MegaSquirt) - which can use the wide band's input.
IMO narrow band gauges are not worth the money (even though MUCH cheaper) - especially on a carbed car. They only read the mixture in a very tight band around stochio before pegging 'full rich' or 'full lean' - and a carbed car will rarely be within that tight boundary. Narrow band sensors work great for their purpose - telling an FI computer to increase or decrease fuel - but not to run a gauge.
--
I'm JohnMc, and I approved this message.
|