I can't speak for the original poster's intentions, but I can come up with 3 performance-oriented reasons why:
1. suspension upgrades are availabe for solid axle cars. Although the IRS has less unsprung weight, if an IRS car is limited to stock springs and shocks, a solid axle car can be made to handle better (at the expense of a soft ride, of course)
2. Cheap and effective (more effective than OEM volvo) LSDs are availabe for solid axles, like the detroit truetrac and the Dana PowrLok. Not too big of an issue with a 960, but with a modified 760 turbo or 940SE, or v8 swap ....
--Somebody please correct me if the same diffs fit into the IRS housing, I am not aware if this is the case
3. 1031 and even 1030 straight axles have been shown to be very strong, for lots of power.
Just to provide some justification here, the 95+ 960 is a very nice car, in terms of interior and exterior finish and appearance. A performance-oriented person with a decent budget might be tempted to buy one of these and upgrade the power in some way, but might be discouraged by the lack of suspension upgrade options available for the IRS.
Andy
|