Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 3/2009 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

561 ECU failure 200 1989

I had a no start situation in one of our 89 240's. Substituting a known good fuel pump relay didn't help. Jumping fuse 4 to 6 caused the pump to run and the car to start. Substituting a 951 ECU from a running parts car cured the problem.

Can anyone share their 561 failure story? I'm wondering if this is the typical failure most people experience. I've been told the common failure results in a loss of ground to the fuel pump relay. Does jumping fuse 4 to fuse 6 provide that ground or am I just eliminating the fuel pump relay altogether when I jump the fuses? (I am electrically challenged) Thanks for any input.

It would seem that besides a resoldered fuelpump relay it might be a good idea to carry a short jumper wire with alligator clips for a quick "get me home" fix. Especailly if you are still running a 561 ECU. BTW mine failed at 162,000 miles.

Randy








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    561 ECU failure 200 1989

    I replaced the eprom chip in mine while it was still good, as a precaution after I replaced all of the sensors in the car, and I keep the old good chip in the glove box, so if the thing ever poops out , it only takes about ten minuits to swap out the chip and be rolling again.
    --
    -------Robert, '90 240 wagon, '84 240 diesel , '80 245 diesel








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    561 ECU failure 200 1989

    Oh, I forgot to address your question. The jumper at the fuse panel does get the relay out of the picture instead of supplying the relay ground.
    --
    Art Benstein near Baltimore








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    561 ECU failure 200 1989

    Randy,

    I haven't had one fail yet. Actually used one to replace a failed 933 in my 89. But it would be good to find the reason for yours. I would be willing to try to analyze it for you. I traced the circuit for the fuel pump relay ground several times, because each time I wound up in a very delicate area of the ECU instead of something more likely to be used to drive a relay coil. Remains a mystery to me until I get hold of a bad one.

    --
    Art Benstein near Baltimore








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      561 ECU failure 200 1989

      I've heard that the TO-220 which pulls the relay to ground opens up; I haven't actually experienced it myself.








      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

        561 ECU failure 200 1989

        That is just what I was looking for, although it wouldn't take anything as large as a TO-220 package to close a 120mA relay, I trace the pin back to the same hybrid used to condition the AMM output, and that makes no sense to me. In the earlier ECUs, the fuel pump driver transistor is discrete and large enough to handle the job and well protected against reverse EMF. I keep thinking I missed a track until I prove it goes there with an ohmmeter. Oh, well, if it is in the hybrid, its fragility is understandable.
        --
        Art Benstein near Baltimore







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.