Volvo RWD ALL Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 7/2003 ALL INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

As the owner of two older ('86 245 and '83 244) 200 series Volvos, sometimes I wonder if I'm in denial about the real condition of these vehicles. They are in reasonable condition and mechanically sound, but they are also 15 and 18 years old, respectively.

I know that many of us like to believe that our old Volvos are somehow superior to those "new fangled" FWD cars. We tend to think that they are safer, more reliable, and better made as if there were some kind of magic involved, or they aren't susceptible to the problems that affect all older cars.

I guess this is what has kept me (and my bricks) going...the notion that I am driving something different, something unique, and something that is timeless.

But it's been nearly a decade since the last 240 rolled off the assembly line at Gothenburg. Surely a great deal of progess has been made since 1993, or maybe I'm wrong?

Do you feel that there is any reason to hold on to these cars, other than sentimental value?









  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

    Hee hee hee...

    I always cite my parents as perfect examples. They drive everywhere in their 90s RWD volvos.

    One of their friends is on their SECOND Grand Cherokee (lemon buyback).

    They started buying older RWD VOlvos now too, after spending almost $45k on (part of) 2 grand cherokees over the last year and a half. Because they could have FIVE 940s for what they paid for their one pile of crap.

    That hurts, doesn't it? Knowing that you'll NEVER get that extra 35,000 back? Sure, you can MAKE another 35k but you'll never get the stuff you already spent back again.

    Not to say I don't like modern cars. I might move up to a later 90s 850 in a year or so and see how it goes. I really don't care... I am just too cheap to buy a brand new car, that's all.

    In fact, I'm currently looking for a 93-94 Lexus LS400. They're nice too.

    Well, I'd go as new as maybe 97 if the price was good.

    Guess I'm just 8 or 10 years behind the times. Anyway, you could do worse than older Volvos, that's for sure.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

    Coming from driving old British sports cars, my '71 142E is a Rolls Royce!

    Paid for, DIY repairs, $100 for a 5-year 'collector car' license, and only has to pass 'visible smoke at idle' smog test. The front seats are still some of the most comfortable ones in the World that I can afford!

    Already converted to unleaded...someday they may make me put a cat on it, or I will convert it to LPG - so what?

    Safety? Hell, I ride mototcycles. My Volvo is a warm and fuzzy safe cocoon.

    Our cars were once grassey hills. No one needs to dig up another hill and make me a new car. I'll keep this one.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

    You started your post:

    "As the owner of two older ('86 245 and '83 244) 200 series Volvos...."

    What you are fooling yourself about is that those are not older cars,

    they are NEWER cars. The older ones are the early 444s and previous

    that never got imported to the US. I finally gave up on the middle-

    aged 444s and 544s in 1971 and got myself a modern Volvo - a '63 122

    4-door sedan.

    Because of long distance traveling in a borrowed car around the time

    of Esther's accident I finally decided to buy the borrowed car after

    I put 6000 miles on it, but it turned into a Volvo (a 92 Taurus) but

    I still have 3 real Volvos, the 66 122 wagon, the 69 164 and the

    Yellow Peril ('73 145E). Far as I'm concerned when they went back

    to metric they left a lot of us behind. See Matt's website,

    www.metricsucks.com








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

    Heck, I havn't even fooled myself into thinking that a late 80s 240 is an old obsolete car....and I havn't fooled myself into thinking that my 71 145 is a classic yet. They are all just damn good cars, and they don't make 'em like they used to.

    For my money, I want a car that I can feel confident to take anywhere knowing that if it breaks anywhere, I can probably get it back on the road...of course, they rarely break...they jst sort of wear out.

    Nope...not me. I don't plan to ever buy a car that I can't fix myself. And I'd rather be in a wreck in my 30 year old Volvo than a stinkin' honda anyday.

    -Matt B

    71 145s

    65 1800s

    53 Jaguar

    other junk








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

    We have three kids and a fully paid for Volvo wagon. With the money we are NOT paying monthly for a leased minivan or payments on a new car that would even come close to the Volvo's capacity, comfort, handling, and reliability, we do a lot of other things:

    1. Save for kids' university (Canadian RESP deposits attract a gov't contribution)

    2. Buy a well-bred dog, and have the cats and dog well looked after.

    3. Eat out quite often

    4. Eat salmon, lobster, Alberta beef, etc. quite often

    5. Do home reno and decoration with the best materials

    6. Buy whatever bulbs/perennials/annuals/trees we like

    7. Make frequent book store or toy store trips with something for everybody

    8. Don't question the value of kitchen equipment or tool purchases

    9. Buy motors for the boy's rockets

    10. Buy beading and art supplies for the girls

    11. Buy premium beer when we want it

    The list goes on and on. As long as your Volvo is reliable, economical, and structurally sound, you will be rich. A new car is nice I guess (I wouldn't know myself) but makes you poor.









    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

      Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? 200 83

      To Brian Oliver: Does anyone in this post really care what you spend your money on? C'mon, let's stay on track. Volvos are the subject. Not someone's grocery list.








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

      Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? 200 83

      To Brian Oliver: Does anyone in this post really care what you spend your money on? C'mon, let's stay on track. Volvos are the subject. Not someone's grocery list.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

    Old but reliable---even my new 93 is the same. Parts fit it that date back to the first 700's produced. It is mine and I can play and rarely make fatal errors with it. Try that on the new FWD jobs, that is if you can get your hand in there to do anything. Son-in-law and daughter each have 98 S70's----nice, but just dont have the personality.

    And, those RWD turbos can sure be surprising to a few folks!

    Guess I will keep fooling myself.

    dick








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

    "...the real condition of these vehicles...in reasonable condition and mechanically sound...they are also 15 and 18 years old..."

    True. How old is the Brooklyn Bridge and how many people depend on it -- risk their lives on it -- every day to get to work?

    My point is that mere age (or youth) is not always a valid measure of value or utility. Would you prefer a new Yugo or a good running, rust free '73 ES?

    "...it's been nearly a decade since the last 240 rolled off the assembly line at Gothenburg. Surely a great deal of progess has been made since 1993..."

    Industry has learned how to make stuff even lighter, thinner, cheaper. More thin plastic replacing thick plastic, more thick plastic replacing aluminum, more aluminum replacing steel. Smaller, lighter, thinner, cheaper spare tires.

    No more head gaskets -- a head job you could once do in your garage now requires a clean room. Super expensive special tools needed for what was once a backyard job (timing belt, for example).

    "...any reason to hold on to these cars, other than sentimental value?"

    Oh, let's see. My '86 245 with 260k miles starts EVERY morning, gets me to work EVERY morning, gets me home EVERY night, hauls all kinds crapola all over on the weekends.... Is warm, comfortable, safe, and reliable in the winter slush 'n snow..... Always stops on a dime when I hit the brakes..... I don't really worry about a few door dings.... Decent service literature is available.... Almost anyone can repair one, and parts are available at reasonable prices from reasonable vendors..... You don't need a Ph.D. in Applied Volvology to change the oil.....

    And best of all, It's mine and it's paid for...









    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

      Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

      You said it Don.

      It's mine and it's paid for...

      I'm still paying lots of dough for my 960. It's a safe and reliable car but damn, that's lots of money each month.

      So, I drive my 15 y/o 744Ti, with the original turdbo I might add, and it starts every day, is powerful, has most of what I want on it, I would like a few extras from MVP or IPD, bigger wheels and tires come to mind, but I must wait. So while others lease their cars for two years and get another, I soldier on with my truely magnificent machine, paid for as Don says...








      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

        Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

        What's the mileage up to on the old turdbo? Think it'll make it to 300K?








        •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

          Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

          273,000 and rolling. 300K, here I come.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Re: Answers to my own questions... ALL all

    I think that I just remembered why...

    The seats in that damn thing are so comfortable (great for long drives!) that I've thought about having wheels put on one for the den.

    The wagon, with the back seat folded, can carry all kinds of crap.

    The suspension, with poly bushings and good shocks 'n struts, is excellent. Very firm, but not overly harsh, and yet extremely comfortable on the highway at 75mph. Excellent feedback, something that you don't experience much of on FWD cars.

    It doesn't look like a Sardine can on wheels.

    The M46...a manual tranny that has decent ratios and doesn't require constant "rowing" in traffic. What a notion!

    I can work on it myself, without a garage worth of expensive specialty tools.

    It looks funky, but in a cool kind of way.

    It will always be "something different"......









    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

      Re: Answers to my own questions... ALL all

      Jim -

      You voice Q's we all think of, especially when wife.gov says "You want to spend how much on that old thing?".

      Disregarding fair wear and tear items, would you keep the 240 if

      (1)It didn't handle like it does? (2) Wasn't as comfortable? (3) Was impossible for us DIY guys to work on? (4) Had not a shred of status? (5) Couldn't carry as much as your 245 does? (6) Had none of the designed-in safety things? (7) Didn't have the parts and info network support we find on the BB? (8) Looked like all the others?

      Well, I can't think of which one would cause me to have something else.

      There will be a time, I suppose, when the economics of needed repairs are just too much. Not in the forseeable future around here.

      Thanks for a good Yak.

      Regards,

      Bob

      :>)









      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

        Re: Answers to my own questions... ALL all

        "Thanks for a good Yak."

        Are you kidding?? Haven't you ever seen/read about how ridiculously unsafe Soviet aviation was?

        ;->








        •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

          Re: Yakety Yak... ALL all

          Was the Yak Soviet aircraft named after the hairy Himalayan animal? The other way round? Does it fly like one? Or is it a miss-spelled Yuk? A contraction of Yeti?

          Why are you up?? Have you found gainful employment yet? There's no money in harassment, y'know.

          G'night

          Bob

          :>)









  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

    i wonder the exact same thing...

    as a boy of 18 yrs... there must be nothing that could get me less chicks than an 88 volvo with yellow headlights and badly sunburned paint, added to the poor cooling in a car i have to park in the sun... its always gotten me to my classes... although it did blow a water pump the 1st day i drove it, the day after i bought it, in a violent ordeal...

    from the glovebox falling off to rattles and no a/c, ive taken this car VERY far from the poor state it was in... but now my interior is IPD'd and i may drop 1000 into the paint, and this very question is on my mind... is the old volvo worth it? its not toyota reliable, its hot, its decisivly unsexy, and on my youthfull priority list - i cant even beat a 3 cylinder metro in a race... so 1000 for paint on a 2000 dollar car? i do love it, and sentiment may be what keeps me in it...

    but am i just fooling myself? do i read articles and look at pictures of rebuilt 400 horse 240's b/c i like them or b/c i cant afford payments on a 2001 celica? i do like RWD, FwD was introdced for cheaper production, and as i explain to my rice-sporting friends, "if FWD has all this great control and handling, its a wonder we dont see more FWD racecars?" wheres the FWD nascar and indy? awe... if anyone was doing research on how to run cars faster and handle better, i think they would be all over it... where is my FWD porsche?

    But besides my disgust for the plastic car, sometimes i sit back and wonder if having a solid steal car is so important? does it matter in the long run? and i also wonder if a hot, ugly, chipped up, SLOW - RWD car is better than a civic? in all honesty its not...

    i suppose i have been fooling myself, i should give in and buy a new car, get a 10 year warranty, take it to the shop for oil changes, and put fog lights and a 900000 watt speaker system in it... it would be alot easier on me... but am i going to? no ;)

    if anything, i may have to drive rice, park the volvo, and one day, if my college pays off, tear it down to the frame and put it back together the way I WANT IT :)

    i think were all fooling ourselves... to be honest, and i perfectly understand any of you taking offense, but it doesnt matter b/c we are all in this game, and even through rebuilt transmissions and periodic catastrophies, all over the course of a few months, im here to stay! :D








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

    Ill admit I have "riced out" my own volvo, but when ever I go somewhere and someone asks me ..hey what car do you drive, and I say yeah that one volvo. They always know. I mean shoot I was at sac raceway which is many miles away from home talking to some guy that I had never seen before and he said he knew my car, thought it was interesting and said someone told him I was running 15lbs of boost. Yep i am all N/A. Hmmm. Thats why I drive the volvo. Its different and when lowered it looks mean as hell.

    Adam








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

      Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

      They can have my 240! When they pry my cold dead fingers off the steering wheel!








      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

        Re: Are we just fooling ourselves? ALL all

        Ill second that!!







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.