Volvo RWD 140-160 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 2/2022 140-160 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

B20 'STREET PERFORMANCE' Engine Suggestions 140-160 1972

Suggestions, please! Stock 1972 142S / M41

Want a modest 'Street Performance' type engine build, using available off-the-shelf parts.

Block: How much overbore?
Head: Port & polish?
Cam: ?
Intake: ?
Carb: ?
Header: ?
Exhaust: ?

Many thanks for your advice.








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

Depends on how much extra power you are looking for. I have a B20E which is the highest output version of the B20. It is more powerful than a B20B; but, not by a lot and its still a noisy engine with a narrow power band (compared to modern engines). If you are looking for significant reliable power increases your low cost solution will be a more modern engine transplant. Picking an engine and gear box from a car with a similar in-line engine configuration will make life simpler. A Mazda MX5 or Saturn Vue / Pontiac Solstice come to mind (salvaged MX5s can be hard to find). The turbo versions of the Vue / Solstice would toast the Dana 30 differential so stay away from them unless you want to do a complete drive train. There are other options such as the Ford Lima engine. The Volvo B230FT engine is possible; but, probably more work because of its tilt (turbo interference with the right inner fender) and the intake manifold - brake booster interference.



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

If you take out the B20, you don't have a Volvo anymore.

The B230FT sucks because cylinder head is terrible. B234 if you want a better Volvo donkey, although I'd stick the B234 head on a B23 & a mild stroker like this:

http://www.topplocksverkstan.se/volvo16vrc.html 300+ BHP without a hair drier.





Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

Will stick with a Volvo engine. A modest power increase is desired. Car now has a port-matched F head, headers, WEBER 38 DGMS with Cannon intake, D cam.
Would like to try a TINUSTUNING cam, maybe the TT5, as they have improved on the 50 year old design of the D cam.



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

You don't have to spend a fortune to get some positive results. A '72 142S should have HIF SU carbs. They are fine. To get more oomph from your 2 liter - raise the compression ratio and install a healthier cam. I think your stock compression is something like 9 or 9.5 to 1. If you mill the head 40 or 60 thousandth of an inch that will bump the ratio to around 10.5-11 to 1. That depends on the starting ratio. I think the "green book" lists the head thickness (for lack of a better term at the moment) - that is -- from the head/block mating surface to the machined surfaces on top (head bolt or valve cover machined surfaces). That thickness will determine the compression ratio. I found when rebuilding my B20 that for every 20 thousandth taken off raises the ratio about a half point.
On my engine I went a bit further and found a carb type cylinder head (maybe from a Canada car?) that has the 44mm intake valves (like a Fuel injection head) over the normal carbed 42mm and did some minor porting and port matching on the exhaust side. You don't need any kind of wild cam - the "K" cam works well with carbs. The split exhaust manifold may not look sexy but is very efficient. A switch to the later Bosch electronic distributor or a good aftermarket will be a plus. I wouldn't go for any radical boring - at the most that will get you a few cubic inches - but make the block un-rebuildable. A few simple changes can get you from the original 118hp up to about 130 - something you'll feel. Good Luck with your project. - Dave



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

"the "K" cam works well with carbs": This is very true because it has the same seat to seat timing.

Low Compression, closing the lobe centres up a little is helpful.

High Compression, a longer exhaust lobe can be used because high compression & high octane burns faster, so opening the exhaust valve earlier helps overcome the poor exhaust port flow.



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

I thought of one thing additional -- budget enough to have hardened seats installed on the exhaust side to better match todays fuels. - Dave



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

How much money you got???

What have you got now?

Strombergs? SU's HS6 or HIF6?





Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

This is a good starting point. It was one of the first things I read when I started building my 145. The DCOE intake/carb setup is a bit lavish, but you can always opt for the more "modest" alternative, the Weber DGV.

http://www.vclassics.com/mppe1.html



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.




<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.