Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 3/2005 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

86-93 240 headlamp upgrade without installing e-codes. 200

Everyone knows the US spec headlamps on '86-'93 240s are terrible. The "real" solution is either installation of ECE headlamps -- either original Cibie units (holy grail) or aftermarket (good but not perfect), which are somewhat expensive. A cheaper solution has been upgraded wiring harness and relays and slightly high wattage bulbs. Unfortunately, this still does not solve the problem of the poor US-spec beam pattern.

For the past 10 years or so, I have been running the Osram/Sylvania Xtravision bulbs (recommended by Daniel Stern of the much-respected Stern Lighting), which slightly increased the quality of the 9004 headlamp beam pattern in both terms of quality of light and beam pattern. These bulbs DID improve the lighting, and they were cheap, so I didn't really give them any more thought.

Well, the other day, while listing a set of unused Silverstar Bulbs on ebay (IMO useless bulbs which I had received as a gift), I got to wondering about 9004 bulbs and if, in fact, someone had taken the Xtravision concept a bit further and improved the 9004 bulb to actually provide a more useable light pattern.

Well, I found these: http://www.amazon.com/Philips-9004XVS2-X-Treme-Vision-Headlight/dp/B00BQWQLOK

Philips "X-treme Vision" 9004 bulbs. Note that I am normal skeptical of anything with "X-treme" printed on the packaging, but after reading reviews I decided to order up a set. It turns out that these bulbs are also recommended by Daniel Stern, which gave me some additional confidence in the selection.

After installation, and a few night drives, I can say that they have dramatically improved the light output from the stock US-spec headlamps. Beam reach and spread is improved, and the lights have a somewhat sharper horizontal cutoff. Don't expect ECE type lighting, but you can expect a noticeable improvement.

If you're looking for a cheap headlamp upgrade for your US-spec '86-93 headlamps, give them a try.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    I agree with everything you wrote, but only through to paragraph 3 .... 200

    I agree with everything your wrote through paragraphs 1 to 3, but I don't see how any 9004 bulb inserted into the USA headlights could improve your lighting. With all due respect, I suspect that your praise is due to hope, rather than reality.

    Yes, I haven't tried those bulbs, and I can't ever because I've got Euroheadlights in both of my cars, actual Volvo/Cibie's in mine, and the DJAuto's in my wife's (both '93s).
    [full disclosure: I've used Cibie H4's of various model iterations for ~40 years, i.e., in all my car's (almost all Volvos) since the early 1970's, when for most of this time they sold substitutes for USA sealed beams -- my greatest disappoint in Volvos was when they adopted proprietary (non-sealed beam) headlights for which I couldn't buy Cibie e-codes for a small fraction of what I paid for these Euroheadlights -- but I spent the big bucks anyway because I just couldn't stand the USA "plastiques" :-).]

    But my skepticism about those Philips bulbs stems from my knowing some things about headlight optics. For one thing, the USA plastic headlights have two major flaws, both dictated by USA Gov't ignorance. One of the flaws is that the optics, specifically the placement of the bulb's filament, and primarily the parabolic reflector behind it, ensures that the vast majority of the light output will be directed uselessly at the pavement about a car length in front -- stemming from the fear of dazzling oncoming drivers. This is exacerbated by the second flaw, the lack of a cutoff shield for the low beam. With these headlights, if you reaim them (I tried this first, before trashing them when I bought my Euroheadlights) so that the low beam is directed a little farther ahead (in a vain attempt to make it more useful), the high beam winds up illuminating only the tops the trees -- i.e., the angle between the low and high beam is just too great for both to be useful.
    [btw, an excellent review of headlight high and low beams, the significant and contributions of the filament placement and parabolic reflector, and even the minor additional help from the front lens, are all provided in Bosch's "Automotive Handbook". I recommend it.]

    Therefore, I am very dubious about how any 9004 bulb inserted in these terrible headlight housings could really provide any real benefit. All you are doing is dumping a greater number of photons "down the drain" so to speak. It still can't provide the optimum beam illumination pattern for low beams and combine it with a useful high beam. And simply having more photons spilling beyond the main focus (and perhaps brightening the periphery of the illuminated field), the bulb is just making glare worse for other drivers.

    Unless or until you've tried an e-code or Euroheadlight and realized how their low-beam's very sharp, sloping cutoff illuminates the road ahead (avoiding glare to drivers in front of you yet illuminating, off to the right, road signs, deer and even moose -- not to mention pedestrians and bicyclists along the side of the road), you really can't appreciate what you're missing.

    But if you can't install Euroheadlights, you might be much better off (than relying on hopped up 9004's) by bolting a pair of quality fog lights (including having a good cutoff shield) under your bumper (provided that, hopefully, you aim them properly, e.g., the way Dan Stern instructs at his website).
    [disclaimer: I've always been a fan of Dan -- he really is a great guy -- and over many years bought many of my aforementioned Cibie e-codes as well as their H4's from him; along with other stuff.]








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      I agree with everything you wrote, but only through to paragraph 3 .... 200

      I would not claim they approach e-codes in light pattern or output, and I agree that the US spec optics (terrible for all the reasons you mention) can only be helped so much. However, these bulbs apparently use a different filament design, (much like Sylvania Xtravision) halogens that does produce more useful light from that headlamp assembly. Try 'em and see.

      BTW- I have been toying with the idea of doing the E-code conversion on the '93 classic wagon, but then it wouldn't exactly be orginal. Still, I might...










  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    86-93 240 headlamp upgrade without installing e-codes. 200

    One step further is the PIAA bulbs. Outstanding improvement as stock replacement with no new harness or light buckets.








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      86-93 240 headlamp upgrade without installing e-codes. 200

      Not to steal your thunder, but Stern Lighting site has a good description of why PIAA and Silverstar lights with tinted bulbs are nothing more than marketing hype, and actually put LESS useable light on the road. But if you like 'em, run 'em.








      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

        86-93 240 headlamp upgrade without installing e-codes. 200

        Check the wattage output and YES they do put ALOT more light out of the standard buckets. So what is Stern selling on his site?







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.