Volvo RWD 700 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 1/2010 700 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

16V HEAD SWAP ON B230FT GOOD OR BAD IDEA? 700 1986

I have the whole setup available to me but will I get much power out of it ?
Will it fit without modifications to the 230 block ? Can the valves take the heat on the twin cam head? Like to find out before I start thinking about tearing it down. Anyone that can help me with info?








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

16V HEAD SWAP ON B230FT GOOD OR BAD IDEA? 700 1986

you may want to lighten up a bit... Many of the guys here have been working with and modifying Volvo engines while you were still breastsfeeding.
--
'75 Jeep CJ5 345Hp ChevyPwrd, two motorcycles, '85 Pickup: The '89 Volvo is the newest vehicle I own. it wasn't Volvos safety , it was Longevity that sold me http://home.lyse.net/brox/TonyPage4.html http://cleanflametrap.com/tony/








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

16V HEAD SWAP ON B230FT GOOD OR BAD IDEA? 700 1986

I appologize for my conduct. I have been playing with Volvo engines since 75 I have no expert knowledge of the twin cam engines. I read that the B24 was just a head difference and nothing else. I stand corrected and sorry again for disrespecting the board and its members.








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

16V HEAD SWAP ON B230FT GOOD OR BAD IDEA? 700 1986

no.

1-the balance shafts on the 16v are there for a reason.

2-the turbos use sodium filled exhaust valves to deal with the heat.

3-if you can deal with 1 and 2, i guess you are good enough to hang a turbo on a 16v exhaust manifold and route the oil lines.

i've seen turbo 16vs on the web, but never looked into feasability. good luck, chuck.








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

16V HEAD SWAP ON B230FT GOOD OR BAD IDEA? 700 1986

Nobody mentioned valve reliefs in the pistons? They're there for a reason too...

--
Dale








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

16V HEAD SWAP ON B230FT GOOD OR BAD IDEA? 700 1986

Another big appology to Porkface from turboman86. You are right 100 percent. I looked at the differences. I heard from some folks that you are good for info and I hope you accept the appologies. I was told by some idiot that this could be done and I insulted you,never will happen again bud,OK !








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

16V HEAD SWAP ON B230FT GOOD OR BAD IDEA? 700 1986

The B234 IS A B230 WITH A TWIN CAM HEAD.Turbobricks had the answers without the sarcasim and to help you out IT IS THE SAME BLOCK. Thanks for the info.








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

16V HEAD SWAP ON B230FT GOOD OR BAD IDEA? 700 1986

the b234 has a different block than a b230. the balance shafts have dedicated oil passages to and from the block.

the b234 doesn't have holes to oil the turbo like the b230ft does. just pointed it out. if you had all the answers, why ask and get po'd when you don't like the answer. don't bother responding, i'm done here, chuck.








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

16V HEAD SWAP ON B230FT GOOD OR BAD IDEA? 700 1986

From Wikipedia:

"Introduced in 1989 for the 740 GLE (and later used in the 940/960), The 16-Valve Redblock motors were offered in both a 2.0 litre Turbo and a 2.3 litre 154hp Naturally aspirated version. The head was designed for Volvo by Porsche.[citation needed] In addition to the 16 Valve head, these motors were equipped with twin counter rotating external balance shafts and the engine block itself differs from the 8V redblock. The block differed from the standard B230 in that the auxiliary shaft (used to drive the oil pump and distributor on models that had block mounted distributors) was replaced with an external oil pump. The 16-Valve head was itself a completely new design for Volvo: The head was of a multi-piece design featuring a separate cam carrier and lower section. The later "white block" motors can trace their head design back to the two-piece setup found in the B204 and B234. The 2.0 litre variant was available in turbocharged form in some markets (B204FT/GT). Unique to the B204 turbo was an exhaust gas pyrometer which was used to detect excessively high exhaust temperatures. When excessively high exhaust temperatures were detected, the fuel injection computer would richen the mixture. It has a forged crankshaft, cast pistons, and 13 mm (0.5 in) connecting rods.
Although a powerful engine for its' time, the 16 Valve engine can experience some problems that can be solved easily. One of the few problems is the oil pump gear. The oil pump gear itself can fail around the mounting flange, or, more often, the weak 8.8(grade 5) grade bolt holding the gear can break. It is strongly recommended to use a 10.9 (grade 8) grade bolt when replacing the oil pump gear. Another cause for timing belt failure is improperly adjusting the timing belt on engines with a manual tensioner (1989 to very early 1990 models only) or improperly adjusting the balance shaft belt. Because this is an interference engine, damage will occur if the timing belt fails. Another common occurrence is that the balance shaft's oil seals are prone to leak on older engines. New replacement sealings tend to start leaking again due to 'worn in irregularities' on the shaft itself. Many people have removed the balance shaft belt or the balance shaft assemblies altogether to prevent belt failure and/or leakage. The balance shafts are only there to lessen vibration for a smooth idle, and removing them will not harm the engine. Once all the common problems are solved, the 16 Valve engines are just as reliable as their SOHC counterparts.
The recommended timing belt interval for these engines is every 50,000 miles, or earlier if the engine is modified. It is also recommended to replace the crank and camshaft seals at every interval and to thoroughly inspect the tensioner and idler pulleys for wear."

Regarding Sodium filled valves- I have 2 760 1990 and 1989 turbos replaced the heads 7 and 5 years ago with regular heads ( from a non turbo engine, no sodium filled valves)
I live in FL (hot summers) and my right foot likes to push the gas pedal to the bottom every day on the interstate- the result is- well same as if they were sodium filled valves- I have seen merging speeds of 110mph and cruising at 90mph on a daily basis for 5-7 years with both Garret T3 and Mitsu TD04 turbos, with factory boost pressure 9 PSI ??
Bottom line is are you willing to work on the car more than to drive it, or in general is this a track car or a daily driver.

We are the volvo drivers, let's be friends and stick together!








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

16V HEAD SWAP ON B230FT GOOD OR BAD IDEA? 700 1986

Thanks that's good info and sorry to be a A-hole towards you,maybe just a bad day for me?








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

16V HEAD SWAP ON B230FT GOOD OR BAD IDEA? 700 1986

Hey TURBOMAN86
you may want to lighten up a bit... Many of the guys here have been working with and modifying Volvo engines while you were still breastsfeeding.
--
'75 Jeep CJ5 345Hp ChevyPwrd, two motorcycles, '85 Pickup: The '89 Volvo is the newest vehicle I own. it wasn't Volvos safety , it was Longevity that sold me http://home.lyse.net/brox/TonyPage4.html http://cleanflametrap.com/tony/







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.