Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 6/2007 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Why you always put (only) 2 new tires on the rear (when you don't buy 4) -- a Michelin video ... 200

About a week ago, I posted a reply to someone on this forum -- among the things that they wrote was that they had just bought two tires, and had them mounted at the front.
One of the points that I made in my reply is that they should move those new tires to the rear. I don't know if they took my advice, but coicidentally (now, a week later) I just got an e-mail from Michelin that included a link to a video they made to show why this advice is sound.
If anyone wants to see this video, use the link following:
http://www.michelinman.com/tire-care/tire-basics/reartire-change/

Regards to all








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

    The folks at Michelin know a thing or two about tires and traction. I have seen their video and I understand why they are suggesting that new tires go on the rear of the car, even with FWD.

    I generally rotate my tires and replace them in sets of four, except for the wifemobile that has wider wheels and tires on the rear so I can't rotate them.

    On the rare occasion that I do buy only a pair of tires, such as I did two years ago on the daughter's car, I put the new tires on the front. The curvy waterlogged track scenario shown in the Michelin video is not the only condition under which my cars drive.

    BTW, gasoline-fueled bricks are not particularly front-heavy, and my other three cars (BMWs) are exactly 50/50 with one or two passengers aboard, so the front end weight rationale does not apply to me.



    Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

    The concept is correct and also the video is a good find.

    The extra weight in the front of the car will get you better traction there, assuming equally worn tires.

    If one pair has more wear, it should be on the front. Unless it's seriously worn the added weight will improve the traction up front giving better balanced traction front/rear. With the better tires on the front the rear will be double-handicapped due to less weight and less tread, not a good situation.
    --
    Sven: '89 245 NA, 951 ECU, expanded air dam, forward belly pan reaches oem belly pan, airbox heater upgraded, E-fan, 205/65-15 at 50 psi, IPD sways, no a/c-p/s belt, E-Codes, amber front corner reflectors, aero front face, quad horns, tach, small clock.



    Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

    Really, it amounts to a question of wether you want no control at the front or the rear of your vehicle, undesirable in BOTH instances, but not a show stopper. The reason this approach is promoted is that most USA drivers are used to understeer, have never experienced anything else in their lives and have no seat of the pants feel to know what is going on with their vehicles.

    Maybe if they just turned down the stereo, put down the latte and unplugged the cellphone...

    Growing Increasingly Cranky with Old Age,

    Tatra Mike
    San Diego, California

    1985 244 "Alfsen" (the first - the flagship)
    1984 245 "Buster" (with the relatives in Seattle}
    1985 245 "Cosmo" (enjoying retirement in the side yard)
    1985 245 "Daisy" (back seat down, full of tools, the work truck)
    1985 245 "Earl (hoozah, another stick shift!)



    Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.




<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.