Volvo RWD 120-130 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 12/2009 120-130 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

122 in the snow 120-130 1966

The weather report in Eastern Washington is calling for snow--which I'm worried will not stop once it starts. My daily driver 1966 auto 122 has lived a sheltered California life and doesn't know what its in for. I have lived a rather sheltered snow driving life, ski trips in my 77 VW Rabbit (front wheel drive, no worries) and my mom's old 4wd Subaru are all I've got. Driving in the snow with the RWD doesn't scare me as much as having to send the ol' girl to the body shop after someone smashes into it (or I find my way into a ditch).

So, here's my question: how do 122s handle in the snow? My Islandic friend who claims to have owned 6 Amazons in Iceland over his lifetime, responded to my question about how they handle in the snow by just saying "crap".

And here's the real question: Should I do as my wife suggests and put studded snow tires on and keep driving or should I get myself a little 4wd pickup or some such thing and let the Volvo settle down for a long winter's nap? I'm leaning towards garaging, but if it will do OK, well...she'll say I told you so.

Also, on the topic of snow tires, does anybody know what sort of rims will fit the 122s? If I go the snow tire route I'd like to get some used tires on rims so I don't have to pay the tire shop to switch em every year.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    122 in the snow 120-130 1966

    With skinny tires and studs in theback (all round if you can)this is the best winter car I have ever driven. The braking with studs in front was awesome!..My winter driving days are over for my 220, I have already sent a 120 to the great rust heap in the sky after driving too many winters (it already had many winters of rust when I got it). It is really a question of the car's condition. I no longer drive anything but junkers in the winter as the get roughed up so much it is not worth the hassle of a shiny car.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    122 in the snow 120-130 1966

    OK, call me a wimp. It snowed on Sunday while I was out and the ride home was quite frightening. Granted, I had my regular tires and just a case of oil in the trunk, but it wasn't the way the car handled that freaked me out. It was all the SUV driving, cell phone talking, morons sliding through intersections menacingly towards my precious Volvo.

    This combined with all the detailed rust prevention descriptions and the other "Erik"'s Spokane specific information: "never drive on south hill in the snow" ("south hill" being where I work and must drive up and down every day) has compelled me to put the 122 in the shop for the winter (this one anyhow).

    I am now the proud owner of a 1986 "beater" 4wd Subaru, which probably won't handle any better, but at least won't give me the shakes every time I start to slide. SUV's do your worst, lay her in the ditch, see if I care. I'll hitch a ride home and spend the evening in the rust free zone of my garage fiddling with my Volvo's carbs.

    I feel as though I have let you all down after all your sage advice. Maybe next winter I'll be braver. But the upside is, its hard to do major repairs on a daily driver, so perhaps we'll just call this a sabbatical and use it as an excuse to get at some of the stuff I've been ignoring. Thanks everyone.

    Erik








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      122 in the snow 120-130 1966

      After driving in Calgary winters for 20+ years, my decision was easy. The 122 stays parked, no matter what. The aforementioned idiots in monster SUV's that have no idea how to control them are my biggest fear. Second to that is the concoction they lay down on the roads here to combat ice. Third is, in combination to that concoction, is a healthy layer of pea gravel. No, they don't use sand; they use crushed rock. My virgin windshield and Cibie cat-eyes are far to precious to expose them to that abuse...

      I say good decision on your part. Winter beaters are much more relaxing to drive...

      Dale








      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

        122 in the snow 120-130 1966

        Good move,you wouldn't want to fly to the desert
        to buy another one in two years anyway.
        Ken
        --
        White 86-245 DL, M 46, IPD bars & Wagon Overloads,Commando Bumpers,SS Belly Pan & Air Pickup,Straight-Shot EMT Chassis & Tower Braces,Scorpius Alloys,2 Belt No AC Conversion,Black POR-15 No Glare Front End








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    122 in the snow 120-130 1966

    I would avoid driving in the winter.

    Attached is an excerpt from a 1962 service bulletin on rust prevention.

    If I had extra time I would try this kit

    http://www.eastwoodco.com/jump.jsp?itemID=10966&itemType=PRODUCT&path=1%2C2%2C372%2C373%2C376&KickerID=40&KICKER

    I drive my 122 in winter only when absolutely necessary and if I run over any snow, I scoop out the wheel wells as soon as I get home.

    Here is what I've learned/done:

    Condesation forms in body panel cavities when moving from varying temperature environments and this can cause a car to rust from the inside out. It is best, therefore, to not have a heated garage.

    If you do any rustproofing (I personally would stay away from "professional undercoaters" unless they blow you away with their expertise in preservation techniques), make sure all weep holes are clear. There are weep holes along the bottom rails underneath the car (the part you step over when you get into the car) and at numerous locations under the chassis. Undercoaters are notorious for plugging these holes.

    There are also weep holes along the bottoms of the doors. Doors fill with crud over the years and should be vacuumed out, clean as best you can, rust treat (I like Must for Rust at Home Depot), let dry completely (important), caulk the seams all the way around (regular house caulk is what I use), make sure the weep holes in the bottom are clear, coat with under coating or roof coating, make sure weep holes are clear.

    make sure the weep holes in the nostril area behind the front grills are clear too. This area, like doors, is basically a sheet metal sandwich the seems of which allow water to wick into them. As with doors: clean, rust treat, let dry completely, caulk the seams all the way around, make sure the weep holes in the bottom are clear, coat with under coating or roof coating, make sure weep holes are clear, paint body color, make sure weep holes are clear.

    Inside the trunk, the rear wheel archs rust from the inside out, especially if water leaks into the trunk. Do the same to the inside outer edges of the trunk compartment as the nostril area (there are no weep holes that I'm aware of in the trunk, however).

    Then there are the fenders/wings. Again sandwiched sheet metal. Remove the wings themselves, scrape-grind-cut out the rust, make metal repairs (take to body shop in my case), treat, seal, reinstall with kit from VPautoparts which includes new rubber strip seal. Or get new wings (pricey) seal really, really, really well on the inside using caulk around seams, rubberized undercoating, etc. so there is no chance for moisture to invade EVER, then reinstall as above.

    I have a set of wings at the body shop and am considering having them spray-weld-galvanized. Anyone done this? See www.rustbusters.com

    Other experts out there, let me know if I'm missing anything.


    Mark Sloo
    Minneapolis, MN











    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      122 in the snow 120-130 1966


      Do not use house caulk for an auto. The correct product is Automobile Seam Sealer. Get it at regular jobber stores, or auto paint suppliers. Tube or can, it's costly but lasts. You wreck a new car and they use house caulk you would have the right to jump on them with both feet and a lawyer.








      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

        122 in the snow 120-130 1966

        Silicone caulking is very bad for paint.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    122 in the snow 120-130 1966

    Hey,

    I used my 544 and 220 wagon all the time between spokane and pullman year round. The amazon is awesome in the snow, the real problem are all the idiots in SUVs that drive too close. Check your defrost hoses under the dash and make sure its in tip top shape. Get studded snow tires, never drive on south hill in the snow, and practice what the car is like in a parking lot. the 220 was always a bit tail heavy, but after some practice you can learn to drive with the gas pedal. Beware that the de-ice goo they use around Spokane promotes rust.

    From a practical point:
    Look at your car and ask yourself if your insurance company will pay what it really costs to fix it, (or if you can afford it), you should answer this question before you even buy tires.

    Enjoy the drive.
    -Erik








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    122 in the snow 120-130 1966

    Forget about 4 wheel drive.Put 4 studded Nokians on the thing, a few sacks of kitty litter in the back and laugh at all the 4x4's spinning out into the ditch while you tool on by feeling like you are just driving on a silty dirt road.
    A set of snows are pretty much cheaper than an insurance deductable and a heck of a lot more fun than spending the night in a ditch waiting on a tow truck.
    --
    -------Robert, '93 940t, '90 240 wagon, '84 240 diesel (she's sick) , '80 245 diesel, '86 740 GLE turbo diesel, '92 Ford F350 diesel dually








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      122 in the snow 120-130 1966

      Here in the land of ice and snow, my remidy is snow tires and my hockey equipment in the trunk. Works like a charm. As for the FWD vs. RWD debate, my RWD always gives me better feedback than the FWD - they always feel fine until you're sideways!

      122 in the snow - as natural as winter in Canada!

      It is -25°C outside right now and the only thing that is preventing me from taking the Canuck to hockey tonight is that I still haven't put the heater in the old girl...

      Craig








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    122 in the snow 120-130 1966

    Thanks, everybody. It sounds like studded tires and weights are in my future.

    Does anybody know what sort of used rims will fit?(so I could look for Ford, or Subaru, or whatever old rims.)

    I'm kind of excited now to drive her in the snow. I figured a Swedish car should be able to handle snow (rubber interior mats and the multi-layer paint should have tipped me off). I think an undercoating will be money well spent as well.

    Unnendur (my Islandic friend) is a bit of a drunk, maybe his winter driving problems have more to do with Islandic Ale than with the Volvo...








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      122 in the snow 120-130 1966

      remember, your Volvo was built in a country with very harsh winters and probably a lot of unpaved roads during its era.
      --
      ...and the bricks keep on rolling








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      122 in the snow 120-130 1966

      Does anybody know what sort of used rims will fit?(so I could look for Ford, or Subaru, or whatever old rims.

      You could go with a set of Ford Ranger or Bronco II rims. They would have the right back-spacing, however, the narrowest they come in is 5.5", and in snow, like in mud, narrow tires are the best. So if you could find some standard Volvo 122 or PV wheels and mount 165 snows, you'd be better off.
      Bob S.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    122 in the snow 120-130 1966

    Erik,
    I second everything that has been said about Amazons in snow and snow tires - standard rims and 165s. I have a 142E as my winter car here in Maine equiped like that with about 100lbs of lead pigs in the trunk. Nothing finer. About fighting rust: In November I put the car up on jackstands to change tires and oil. Before I put the winter tires on, I fill a paint gun with the used crankcase oil and give the whole bottom of the car, including the wheel wells and fenders, a heavy misting. I put plastic bags around the brakes to keep them oil-free, and put a sheet of plastic on the floor to catch the drops. Used crankcase oil seems to adhere better than fresh oil. Some of the old-timers around here like to mix in a little kerosene, but they learned this trick when most cars came without undercoating. I avoid the kerosene so as not to soften the undercoating too much - the oil is just enough to keep it flexible.
    Bob S.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    122 in the snow 120-130 1966

    Spok;

    I have to agree totally with the other responders...with just winter shoes all the way around (unstudded, Gislaved, or Vredesteins in 165SR-15 to be specific), and maybe a hundred pounds of extra ballast in the trunk, I can run cicles around just about all other vehicles including FWD and AWD (especially those on their roof!)...until the snow is so deep, that the undercarriage lifts the tires from the ground...I don't know what your Islandic friend is used to or what he thinks is better...I'd be interested...maybe he likes more ground clearance!

    The other posters also touched upon the critical issue: Subjecting your car to the salt, and worse, the calcium-cloride in use on the roads...rust never sleeps!

    Cheers








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      122 in the snow 120-130 1966

      I failed to mention that I only used Michelin ZX 165SR tires on my 1965 122-S year round. In 1977, earlier in November than now, there was so much snow that the 122 got stranded on a country road, when I slowed down. I beached the car and walked about 2 miles home. After supper, I X-country skied back to the 122 and after many failed attempts, got the car moving and literally plowed my way home, leaving an impression of the car's under carriage between the 2 grooves in the road. Thanks Ron for helping me to remember that event and the plug to another great Canadian (Neil Young). Fe (your 122) + CaCl2 (road salt) + H2O (melted snow) = Fe2O3 a.k.a. RUST!
      --
      Cam a.k.a. CVOLVO.COM








      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

        122 in the snow 120-130 1966

        Cam;

        From My experience, I believe the ground clearance is really the limiting factor...once the car gets beached (great analogy!)...I agree, all is lost...that's why I seriously considered at one point, mounting an angle iron "spoiler" to help plow a path...I've never done it, but the snow being plowed up and over the bumper and into the volume in front of the rad concerned me because of the loss of cooling...

        ...and while we're relating stories...two of my most fun Snow Weasel experiences: Towing cross-country skiers down the street, from the rear door handles, in the Connecticut bizzard of '78, which I believe literally brought the house down (collapsed the civic center roof that is)...or mounting the snow-chains, piling four people into the Snow Weasel, and motoring up 6 inches of virgin snow on Buena Vista Road in town (20% grade?)...just because we could! Now THAT'S fun, vintage Volvo style!

        Cheers








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    122 in the snow 120-130 1966

    I'd be more concerned about what road salt will do to your rust free California 122. Coincidentally, I garaged my Amazon-S for the winter yesterday, where she will stay until the late spring.

    My Amazon came from a northern location in Saskatchewan where salt is not used, hence the body was spared the indignity of rusting out. I once owned a used 1965 122-S that was likewise driven in a more northern location. I drove it for 2 years before moving to Ottawa, where they use excessive amounts of salt to keep the roads devoid of snow. Well, after 1 winter, the floor boards of my 10 year old 122 rusted out! I had to fill the voids with marine plywood and roofing cement. It did survive another winter, but afterwards had to be junked.

    The 122 and PV were not much better than any other car of the day for early rusting, especially when subjected to winter salt. The front fenders get packed with snow near the door and rust badly, as are the reinforcing member that joins the fenders to the front wheel wells. If you must drive your 122 this winter, I'd get it professionally oil sprayed (or undercoated) every fall, especially in these areas to repel the salt as well as possible. Let us know how the 122 fares next spring.
    --
    Cam a.k.a. CVOLVO.COM








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      122 in the snow 120-130 1966

      I don't think they salt the roads in the NW, On the west side of the cascades it's gravel only, no salt at all.
      --
      Lee 75 240 (75k original miles) 65 220 project








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    122 in the snow 120-130 1966

    The 122 is one of the world's best snow cars period. Anyone who thinks otherwise can't drive. Put a hundred pounds of something in the trunk, and studded snows on the back, and the stock skinny tires up front, and you are moving down the road safely. Wave to the knobs in four wheel drive SUV's who are upside down in the ditch as you go by.
    The heaters and windshield defrost are marginal at times here in Canada, but otherwise they are wonderful cars - in all weathers.








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      122 in the snow 120-130 1966

      I drove my '66 two-door through two winters so far in the Washington, DC area. As mentioned above, a set of skinny snow tires and reasonable driving skills took me past dozens of behemoth SUVs stuck on the side of the road. Good clearance under the car and low gearing work fine in the snow. I suspect that the Swedish designers of the car had to take snow driving into serious consideration during development.

      Salt is really what worries me most too. I try to clean the undercarriage whenever possible and hope that some of the external lubrication seeping from the valve cover gasket provides some protection.

      Joe M in WV








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    122 in the snow 120-130 1966

    All the hype about FWD cars being better in the snow is just propaganda fron the manufacturers of FWD cars. My 122's have always been my snow and ice cars.

    In Spokane you will want to use studs on all 4 tires no matter what you drive. They are what gets you moving, and more importantly what gets you stopped.

    If you are uncomfortable driving on snow and ice take some time to practice in a big parking lot or somewhere where you can slide around and not hit anything.
    --
    Lee 75 240 (75k original miles) 65 220 project








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      122 in the snow 120-130 1966

      ...." The 122 is one of the world's best snow cars period. Anyone who thinks otherwise can't drive. Put a hundred pounds of something in the trunk, and studded snows on the back, and the stock skinny tires up front, and you are moving down the road safely."....

      So my 215/45's aren't a good choice? :-)

      Having driven hundreds of thousands of kms in Calgary winters, I can say skinny snow tires are your best weapon. Not those wimpy things they call all season tires; real manly snow tires.

      My 122 stays parked in the winter. My least concern is that I might smack it up. My biggest concern is the other idiots driving their all-season tire equipped suv's...

      Dale







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.