Error: you cannot edit this post. It has been too long since it was posted.

Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 6/2016 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Underpowered 240---might have found the cause 200 1989

posted by  Blue Horse on  Fri Mar 28 16:50 CST 2008
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Mon Apr 8 17:57 CST 2013
[RELATED]

You didn't tell me to modify the snorkel. You merely put an idea in my head, and when I looked at the snorkel, I agreed with your observation, so I pulled it off to see if it would make a difference. I thought it might have, but since I didn't do a series of timed before and after tests, I can't be sure of it. I'm going to put it back on tomorrow, and see if the car seems slower than it was today.

I'm not trying to increase performance beyond stock, just get it back to what it should be, which is the equal of my previous car, an 88 745 with the same engine, manual transmission, and rear axle ratio. By all rights, the 240 should actually be a bit quicker, as it weighs 150-200 lbs less.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 1 Underpowered 240---might have found the cause [200][1989]
posted by  Blue Horse  on Fri Mar 28 10:57 CST 2008 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.