• ALL
• 444-544
• 120-130
• 1800
• 140-160
• 200
• 300
• 700
• 900
• S90-V90

Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 11/2009(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 7/2009 200 INDEX INDEX (NO RELOAD) [<<]  [>>]

VIEW    READ ONLY    PRINT   SAVE   A    A  32 mpg ?? 200 1988 posted by  Ken in Maine on  Fri Jul 3 13:13 CST 2009 Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS]     [IGNORE ALL POSTS] last visit: Sun Sep 6 16:39 CST 2009 [RELATED] I honestly believe the wind resistance may be less with windows down. These cars are not aerodynamic and very squarish so expected not to get really high figures. But that also makes them more stable and solid. 32 seems high yet I am getting 25 in city driving so it may be possible. My car totes about 100 pounds of tools as well as 100 pounds of subwoofer and enclosure. That plus being automatic I think is about right. Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post. Select, copy to buffer, and paste anywhere: <a href="http://www.brickboard.com/RWD/volvo/1357985/220/240/260/280/32_mpg.html">32 mpg ??</a>

[about brickboard ads]

THREADED

THREADED EXPANDED

FLAT

PRINT ALL

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  hawkeye  on Tue Jul 7 09:39 CST 2009 > V
  • 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
    posted by  hawkeye  on Tue Aug 11 14:22 CST 2009 > V
  • 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
    posted by  javalion  on Tue Jul 7 12:25 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  tbb2  on Mon Jul 6 16:19 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  xylopagus  on Mon Jul 6 15:25 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  jthorner  on Sun Jul 5 00:12 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  mikeb17  on Sat Jul 4 18:50 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  Ken in Maine  on Fri Jul 3 13:13 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  javalion  on Fri Jul 3 11:50 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  Owned by Velma  on Fri Jul 3 10:30 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  Lord Volvo  on Thu Jul 2 23:09 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  Ryan_R  on Thu Jul 2 22:35 CST 2009 > V

• Too many variables .... [200][1988]
  posted by  Ken C  on Thu Jul 2 21:40 CST 2009 > V
  • Too many variables .... [200][1988]
    posted by  Cliff Pope  on Wed Jul 8 13:34 CST 2009 > V
    • Too many variables :-) .... [200][1988]
      posted by  Ken C  on Wed Jul 8 14:23 CST 2009 > V
  • Too many variables .... [200][1988]
    posted by  mikeb17  on Sat Jul 4 18:57 CST 2009 > V
    • Don't use the &quot;lever' at all -- but this might reduce the variability .... [200][1988]
      posted by  Ken C  on Sun Jul 5 10:13 CST 2009 > V
      • Don't use the &quot;lever' at all -- but this might reduce the variability .... [200][1988]
        posted by  mikeb17  on Tue Jul 7 19:15 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  Raleigh240  on Thu Jul 2 21:16 CST 2009 > V
  • 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
    posted by  jbeltz76  on Fri Jul 3 15:05 CST 2009 > V
    • 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
      posted by  JPistos  on Thu Aug 13 11:10 CST 2009 > V

©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2007. All material except where indicated.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.