• ALL
• 444-544
• 120-130
• 1800
• 140-160
• 200
• 300
• 700
• 900
• S90-V90

Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 11/2009(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 7/2009 200 INDEX INDEX (NO RELOAD) [<<]  [>>]

VIEW    READ ONLY    PRINT   SAVE   A    A  32 mpg ?? 200 1988 posted by  hawkeye on  Thu Jul 2 21:03 CST 2009 Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS]     [IGNORE ALL POSTS] last visit: Fri Nov 6 15:06 CST 2009 [RELATED] I am still enjoying my 240. I am slowly putting it back together. I have repaired the kickdown cable, the odometer, the shifter bushings, both fuel pumps, the fuel pump relay etc. Here is the weird thing. I drove the car about 270 miles in the two days. I checked the mileage on the way home. Drove about 130 miles on state highways at 45 to 55/60 mph. Some stop and go but not much, no a/c windows down. Makes you realize how bad in interstate really is. The car got 32 mpg. I can hardly believe it. I checked the odometer against my gps over about 10 miles and the odometer was spot on. The best I ever got in my 1990 760T was about 28. Can a 240 get 32 mpg??? Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post. Select, copy to buffer, and paste anywhere: <a href="http://www.brickboard.com/RWD/volvo/1357903/220/240/260/280/32_mpg.html">32 mpg ??</a>

[about brickboard ads]

THREADED

THREADED EXPANDED

FLAT

PRINT ALL

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  hawkeye  on Tue Jul 7 09:39 CST 2009 > V
  • 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
    posted by  hawkeye  on Tue Aug 11 14:22 CST 2009 > V
  • 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
    posted by  javalion  on Tue Jul 7 12:25 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  tbb2  on Mon Jul 6 16:19 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  xylopagus  on Mon Jul 6 15:25 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  jthorner  on Sun Jul 5 00:12 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  mikeb17  on Sat Jul 4 18:50 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  Ken in Maine  on Fri Jul 3 13:13 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  javalion  on Fri Jul 3 11:50 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  Owned by Velma  on Fri Jul 3 10:30 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  Lord Volvo  on Thu Jul 2 23:09 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  Ryan_R  on Thu Jul 2 22:35 CST 2009 > V

• Too many variables .... [200][1988]
  posted by  Ken C  on Thu Jul 2 21:40 CST 2009 > V
  • Too many variables .... [200][1988]
    posted by  Cliff Pope  on Wed Jul 8 13:34 CST 2009 > V
    • Too many variables :-) .... [200][1988]
      posted by  Ken C  on Wed Jul 8 14:23 CST 2009 > V
  • Too many variables .... [200][1988]
    posted by  mikeb17  on Sat Jul 4 18:57 CST 2009 > V
    • Don't use the &quot;lever' at all -- but this might reduce the variability .... [200][1988]
      posted by  Ken C  on Sun Jul 5 10:13 CST 2009 > V
      • Don't use the &quot;lever' at all -- but this might reduce the variability .... [200][1988]
        posted by  mikeb17  on Tue Jul 7 19:15 CST 2009 > V

• 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
  posted by  Raleigh240  on Thu Jul 2 21:16 CST 2009 > V
  • 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
    posted by  jbeltz76  on Fri Jul 3 15:05 CST 2009 > V
    • 32 mpg ?? [200][1988]
      posted by  JPistos  on Thu Aug 13 11:10 CST 2009 > V

©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2007. All material except where indicated.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.