• ALL
• 444-544
• 120-130
• 1800
• 140-160
• 200
• 300
• 700
• 900
• S90-V90

Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 11/2009(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 4/2009 200 INDEX INDEX (NO RELOAD) [<<]  [>>]

VIEW    READ ONLY    PRINT   SAVE   A    A  30 MPG, step-by-step. 200 1983 posted by  Ryan_R on  Sat Apr 25 11:47 CST 2009 Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS]     [IGNORE ALL POSTS] last visit: Fri Nov 20 15:24 CST 2009 [RELATED] WRONG! :-) Wish I knew why this keeps on getting perpetuated. The '90 245 in my sig with LH 2.4 does a solid 32mpg on the highway, and has seen 34mpg on one tank, but that was an outliar. Variable terrain, as well (mountains). LH 2.4 does just as well as 3.1, since we're talking *highway* mileage. Knowing the precise throttle position is moot since it's all about stoichiometry, based somewhat on the AMM, but mostly the O2 sensor. LH 2.2 could probably do about as well. Yes, LH 3.1 will help you a bit with "around town" driving, as throttle position is more variable, and the ECU will get a bit more reaction time... but LH 2.4 is still surprisingly efficient for what it is. Of course, both LH 2.4 and 3.1 are stone age nowadays. :-) -Ryan -- Athens, Ohio 1987 245 DL 314k, Dog-mobile 1990 245 DL 134k M47, E-codes, GT Sway Bars, GT Braces 1991 745 GL 300k, Regina, 23/21mm Turbo Sway Bars Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post. Select, copy to buffer, and paste anywhere: <a href="http://www.brickboard.com/RWD/volvo/1345854/220/240/260/280/30_mpg_stepbystep.html">30 MPG, step-by-step.</a>

[about brickboard ads]

THREADED

THREADED EXPANDED

FLAT

PRINT ALL

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  cerbie  on Sat May 9 23:36 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  benski  on Mon May 4 23:37 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  someone claiming to be dbostrom  on Tue Apr 28 00:01 CST 2009 > V
  • the values of the 240's - one problem, the definition of &quot;better' [200]
    posted by  someone claiming to be V70driver  on Tue Apr 28 06:01 CST 2009 > V

• My boat cost $30,000 once upon a time. We went for a sail, my kid caught a 5 pound grouper . [200]
  posted by  soundmiami  on Sat Apr 25 13:17 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  Boys Brick  on Sat Apr 25 09:21 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  all240s  on Sat Apr 25 07:12 CST 2009 > V
  • the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
    posted by  brickdpeters  on Sun May 3 05:22 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  jthorner  on Wed Apr 22 23:09 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  volvo245kit  on Mon Apr 6 18:11 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  Volvodad  on Mon Apr 6 13:03 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  rhaire  on Mon Apr 6 12:25 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  Stickbuilder  on Mon Apr 6 12:13 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  TONY H  on Mon Apr 6 10:16 CST 2009 > V
  • the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
    posted by  M.E.W Herman  on Sat Apr 25 01:17 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  ODGuru  on Sun Apr 5 12:40 CST 2009 > V
  • the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
    posted by  Williston  on Sat Apr 25 09:45 CST 2009 > V
  • the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
    posted by  walrus3  on Sun Apr 5 13:16 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  matt b  on Sun Apr 5 09:46 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  Ryan_R  on Sun Apr 5 09:13 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  scorron  on Sun Apr 5 08:41 CST 2009 > V

• The &quot;market' value of these cars is not important - we are the last owners of our 240s. [200]
  posted by  Ken C  on Sun Apr 5 08:30 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  punk240  on Sun Apr 5 08:30 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of repairs & parts [200]
  posted by  jfh0jfh  on Sun Apr 5 08:18 CST 2009 > V

• the concept of relative value in a wasting asset [200]
  posted by  trichard  on Sun Apr 5 07:45 CST 2009 > V
  • Money pit 240 but I will prevail. [200][1990]
    posted by  Ken in Maine  on Wed May 6 16:42 CST 2009 > V
  • JZrYkXvmBMGBxSRIjm [200][1989]
    posted by  someone claiming to be ejiexunpn  on Fri May 1 23:40 CST 2009 > V
  • the way I see it [200]
    posted by  volvoboz  on Sun Apr 5 09:00 CST 2009 > V
  • the concept of relative value in a wasting asset [200]
    posted by  volvoboz  on Sun Apr 5 08:50 CST 2009 > V
    • great example [200]
      posted by  trichard  on Sun Apr 5 08:57 CST 2009 > V
      • The later 940's are the best of the 700/900 cars [200]
        posted by  jwalker  on Mon Apr 6 17:12 CST 2009 > V

• the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
  posted by  pageda  on Sun Apr 5 07:08 CST 2009 > V
  • the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
    posted by  wma45  on Thu Apr 23 08:27 CST 2009 > V
    • the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
      posted by  Boys Brick  on Sat Apr 25 09:19 CST 2009 > V
    • the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200][1983]
      posted by  jgreenwood  on Fri Apr 24 23:17 CST 2009 > V
      • the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200][1983]
        posted by  wma45  on Mon Apr 27 18:08 CST 2009 > V
      • 30 MPG, step-by-step. [200][1983]
        posted by  sdewolfe  on Sat Apr 25 03:45 CST 2009 > V
        • 30 MPG, step-by-step. [200][1983]
          posted by  Ryan_R  on Sat Apr 25 08:54 CST 2009 > V
          • 30 MPG, step-by-step. [200][1983]
            posted by  vvpete  on Sat Apr 25 11:24 CST 2009 > V
            • 30 MPG, step-by-step. [200][1983]
              posted by  Ryan_R  on Sat Apr 25 11:47 CST 2009 > V
    • the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
      posted by  WrenWright  on Fri Apr 24 00:08 CST 2009 > V
      • the values of the 240's are not keeping pace with the cost of their repairs and parts [200]
        posted by  ThrottleJockey  on Wed Apr 29 07:30 CST 2009 > V

©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2007. All material except where indicated.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.